Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Salon

Supporters of the disabled should demand Latimer's release

Ken Walker
CMAJ February 12, 2008 178 (4) 520; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080045
Ken Walker MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

Why do advocates for the disabled continue to harass Robert Latimer for ending the suffering of his 12-year-old daughter, Tracy? Rather than fighting for Latimer's continued confinement these organizations and individuals should be shouting to the high heavens for his release.

Surely, those who are most familiar with the hellish problems facing the disabled and their caregivers, should be the first to leap into Latimer's corner. After all, such knowledge usually triggers empathy.

Figure

Photo by: Fred Sebastian

Instead, Canadian newspapers featured a plethora of letters to the editor from caregivers and articles quoting advocacy organizations all supporting the National Parole Board's decision in December to deny Latimer day-parole. The spokesperson for the Canadian Association for Community Living, for example, called Latimer's “profound” lack of remorse “deeply disturbing.”1 Elsewhere, an individual stated that condoning Tracy's death is the start of the slippery slope where no disabled person would be safe.2

Where, one has to inquire, is the empathy for the suffering of this child among these advocates for the disabled?

Back in a 2001, I wrote in my newspaper column, “The Doctor Game,” that before the Supreme Court of Canada's 4 wise men and 3 wise women sent Latimer to jail they should have paused for several days. Why? So that each one of the justices who had condemned Latimer could look after a similar child. They would quickly realize the horrible rigours involved in caring for a child suffering from cerebral palsy in a rural farmhouse, caring for a child who is spastic, quadriplegic and immobile, a child who had suffered through several operations, whose pain could not be controlled, and who was having as many as 6 epileptic attacks a day causing dislocation of her hips. A child who could not communicate her pain. I believe this would have convinced these justices that this family did indeed face psychological trauma and that it was mercy, not murder that motivated Latimer.

Surely the disabled, more than any other people should be able to understand and, through their advocates, articulate Latimer's torment.

Some of these advocates for the disabled defend their views on Latimer in part by saying that Tracy was not capable of giving informed consent. This is a feeble argument and hypocrisy at its worse. We all know that even if Tracy had been a Rhode's Scholar, fully capable of giving informed consent, they still would have objected. In the view of these groups, mercy killing is murder regardless of consent.

Surely, in the name of humanity, these advocates for the disabled should show enough decency not to tar Latimer with the same judicial brush as the current scoundrels that infect our society, the young punks who commit violent crimes and receive unbelievable short sentences.

It is also high time that those with a disability question the motives and philosophy of those who speak on their behalf. Do they truly represent their feelings on this issue? I doubt it. Following my articles denouncing the Supreme Court of Canada's decision I received a volume of mail from people from all walks of life. A minority of readers vehemently disagreed with me. The majority, which included many people living with a disability, thought the law was an elephantine ass, a national disgrace. The overall sentiment was that society should acknowledge that in Latimer, we are not dealing with a hardened criminal. Rather, he is a hard-working farmer who loved his daughter and who could not bear to see her suffer any longer.

Surely it is time for the advocates for the disabled to realize that the justice system, in this particular case, has stepped outside the bounds of common sense. And that keeping Latimer in jail now amounts to persecution rather than prosecution.

Advocates for the disabled would receive great praise from the public if they reversed their stance, and openly agree with the majority of Canadians that Robert Latimer is neither a Paul Bernardo nor a Clifford Olsen.

Or does this logic fall on deaf ears? Do we have to conclude that a small group of armchair ethicists within these organizations will demand that this illogical, insane injustice continues?

Footnotes

  • Dr. Walker writes a weekly column, The Doctor Game, that is published in 60 Canadian newspapers.

    This is the second in a 2-part series on the Latimer controversy; in the Jan. 29, 2008, issue Tom Koch presented an opposing view. If you have an opinion on this issue, please post your views at www.cmaj.ca. Salon contributors are welcome to send a query to salon{at}cma.ca

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Hunter J. Latimer: ‚I still don't feel guilty.' Globe and Mail [Toronto] 2007 Dec 6;Sect A:10
  2. 2.↵
    Serup J. Euthanasia ‚a slippery slope' [letter]. Prince George Citizen 2007 Dec 17. Available: www.princegeorgecitizen.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=108455&Itemid=264 (accessed 2008 Jan 15).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 178 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 178, Issue 4
12 Feb 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Supporters of the disabled should demand Latimer's release
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Supporters of the disabled should demand Latimer's release
Ken Walker
CMAJ Feb 2008, 178 (4) 520; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Supporters of the disabled should demand Latimer's release
Ken Walker
CMAJ Feb 2008, 178 (4) 520; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080045
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
  • Revisiting Rodriguez
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • End-of-life care & decisions

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire