Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

The burden and management of crystal meth use

Jane A. Buxton and Naomi A. Dove
CMAJ June 03, 2008 178 (12) 1537-1539; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.071234
Jane A. Buxton MBBS MHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naomi A. Dove MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

Methamphetamine, a central nervous system stimulant, was first synthesized in 1919 as a synthetic substitute for ephedrine. Occult methamphetamine laboratories emerged in California in the 1960s, and its recreational use spread up and down the Pacific Coast. In the 1980s, d-methamphetamine hydrochloride (crystal methamphetamine, crystal meth; Box 1), which is a crystallized, smokable and more potent form, was developed.1 Crystal meth is more likely to cause dependence than other forms of methamphetamine. It is cheap and readily available, which has led to media reports and public concern about the potential for its increased use among youth. We describe the effects, burden and management of methamphetamine and, in particular, crystal meth in Canada.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 1.

Effects of crystal meth

Crystal meth releases dopamine, which leads to feelings of euphoria (Box 2); however, the timing and intensity depend on how it is administered. If crystal meth is smoked or injected, it causes an almost immediate “rush,” but this takes about 20 minutes to occur if ingested orally. It may also be taken rectally or snorted. Compared with cocaine, crystal meth has a longer duration of action and can keep the user “up” for 12 hours. A user binging on crystal meth (on a “run”) may stay awake for 10 days, often with little food or drink.

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 2.

Users of crystal meth report initially feeling powerful and confident, endless energy, increased productivity, enhanced sexual performance and reduced appetite.2 However, once the initial euphoric effects of the drug wear off, users may experience anxiety, depression, mental confusion, fatigue and headaches.

Long-term use of crystal meth increases the user's tolerance such that larger and more frequent doses are necessary to achieve the desired effect. Its prolonged use causes irritability and psychosis known as “tweaking,” which may result in the user having numerous scabs from picking at imaginary insects crawling on or under his or her skin. Use of other stimulants, such as amphetamine and cocaine, can also result in tweaking. Extreme paranoia and violence may occur and the psychosis may become permanent or continue as flashbacks. Poor oral hygiene in combination with the oral effects of crystal meth use such as dry mouth, teeth grinding and jaw clenching can lead to advanced dental decay known as “meth mouth.”3 Other serious effects of crystal meth are profound weight loss, seizures, cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, stroke and death.

Burden of crystal meth use

Nearly 25 million people worldwide are estimated to have used amphetamine and methamphetamine in the past 12 months. This is more than heroin or cocaine, and it makes amphetamine and methamphetamine the most widely used illicit drugs after cannabis.4 Comparing prevalence estimates and trends of crystal meth use through population surveys is challenging because of selection bias, underreporting and differences in age and terminology. Based on telephone interviews with randomly sampled people aged 15 years and older from each province, the 2004 Canadian Addiction Survey found that 6.4% of respondents reported lifetime use of “amphetamine type substances” and 0.8% of those had used in the past year.5 Similarly, in the United States, 5.2% of people over 12 years reported using methamphetamine and less than 1% reported using in the past year.6 Higher prevalence rates of methamphetamine and amphetamines use have been identified in Australia7 and parts of Europe8 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

Despite growing media attention about crystal meth, the level of use reported by school youth over the past 8 years has declined in Canada9,10 and the United States.11 However, one should remember that youth with recurrent crystal meth use are unlikely to be in school. The 2005 Ontario Student Drug Use Survey found that 2.2% of grade 7–12 students admitted using methamphetamine in the last year, which was down significantly from 5.3% in 1999.9 A similar decline in reported lifetime use of amphetamines (speed, crystal meth) was found in British Columbia (down from 5% in 1998 to 4% in 2003) and only 1% reported using more than 3 times.10 A 2006 nonrandom sample in Vancouver, British Columbia, found that 5.2% of youth aged 16–18 years and 16.5% of those aged 19–25 years reported ever using crystal meth.12 Students who self-identified as gay or bisexual were 26 times (95% confidence interval 6–113) more likely than those who identified as heterosexual to have used crystal meth in the previous year.13 Crystal meth use was reported by 6.6% of street youth in the 2003 Canadian Street Youth Survey but by 67% of street youth in British Columbia in another study.14

The reasons why people use crystal meth vary by the user group. Women are more likely than men to seek weight loss, and men report improved sexual performance as a motivator. Crystal meth can provide the energy to dance for hours and increase libido, and its use by gay men is associated with high-risk sexual behaviour.15 Street youth report using crystal meth as a coping strategy; it allows them to stay awake to protect their belongings, suppresses their appetite so they do not feel the need to eat and helps them cope with negative emotions.16

Treatment of methamphetamine dependence

A consensus panel at the 2004 Western Canadian Summit on methamphetamine identified the need for a continuum of services from prevention to treatment to aftercare that addresses individual needs within a range of harm-reduction strategies.17 A dopamine-blocking agent such as haloperidol may be used for patients with hyperactivity or agitation, and behavioural and psychiatric intoxication related to methamphetamine use may be treated with diazepam.18

Treatment of methamphetamine dependence is challenging because of the high rates of drop out and relapse, ongoing episodes of psychosis, severe craving and anhedonia. No medication has been demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of methamphetamine abuse and dependence; therefore, the mainstays of treatment are contingency management and cognitive behavioural therapy, including the Matrix model of treatment (Box 3).

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 3.

Pharmacological strategies, consisting of the administration of agonists, antagonists and symptomatic treatment for withdrawal effects, have evolved from studies about treatment of cocaine dependence. However, these strategies have not been found effective.21 A Cochrane review of randomized and clinical controlled trials found that antidepressants had no long-term effect on treatment outcome.22

Contingency management is based on the operant conditioning principle that a behaviour is more likely to be repeated when followed by positive consequences. Participants receive rewards for achieving certain goals, such as drug abstinence. In a trial that compared contingency management and usual treatment, those in the contingency-management group submitted more negative drug samples and had a longer mean duration of drug abstinence.19 However, there was no difference in drug abstinence between the groups at 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

Cognitive behavioural therapy focuses on understanding the role of substance abuse in a person's life and fosters the development of coping skills to avoid addiction relapse. The Matrix model is a structured, multi-faceted and manualized approach that incorporates cognitive behavioural therapy principles, individual and family education about addiction and relapse prevention, participation in 12-step or self-help programs or both, and weekly urine monitoring for drug use. One large-scale, multisite study found that the Matrix model produced superior benefits during treatment, but differences between the 2 groups were not observed at discharge or 6-month follow-up.23

Conclusion

Crystal meth is a highly addictive synthetic stimulant. Although reported use among school students has declined, it has devastating effects on those who become dependent. Use appears to be increasing in the difficult-to-study high-risk groups such as street youth and gay men. Treatment is challenging because there is currently no effective medication, and behavioural and cognitive approaches, although effective during treatment, have not shown long-term benefits.

Key points

• Crystal meth is highly addictive and has devastating effects on those who become dependent.

• Its reported use by students has declined since 1998 in Canada and the United States.

• Its use may be increasing among street youth and gay men.

• Treatment of crystal meth dependence is challenging because there are no effective medications, and behavioural and cognitive approaches have not shown long-term benefits.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

    Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anglin MD, Burke C, Perrochet B, et al. History of the methamphetamine problem. J Psychoactive Drugs 2000;32:137-41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Methamphetamine fact sheet. Ottawa: The Centre; 2005. Available: www.ccsa.ca/NR/rdonlyres/A378E355-BB39-45FB-BDB8-FB751EDBAFFD/0/ccsa0111342005.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 15).
  3. 3.↵
    Curtis EK. Meth mouth: a review of methamphetamine abuse and its oral manifestations. Gen Dent 2006;54:125-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2007. New York: United Nations Publications; 2007. Available: www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/WDR-2007-exsum.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 15).
  5. 5.↵
    Adlaf EM, Begin P, Sawka E (editors). Canadian Addiction Survey: A national survey of Canadians' use of alcohol and other drugs: prevalence of use and related harms: highlights. Ottawa: The Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2005. Available: www.ccsa.ca/NR/rdonlyres/B2C820A2-C987-4F08-8605-2BE999FE4DFC/0/ccsa0048042004.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 15)
  6. 6.↵
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2005 national survey on drug use and health: national Findings. Rockville (MD): The Office of Applied Studies; 2006.
  7. 7.↵
    Dunn M, Degenhardt L, Campbell G, et al. Australian trends in ecstasy and related drug markets 2006: findings from the ecstasy and related drugs reporting system. Sydney (Australia): National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales; 2007.
  8. 8.↵
    European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction Annual report 2006: the state of the drugs problem in Europe. Available: http://ar2006.emcdda.europa.eu/en/page008-en.html (accessed 2008 Apr 15).
  9. 9.↵
    Adlaf EM, Paglia-Boak A. Drug use among Ontario students 1977–2005. Toronto: Centre for Addictions and Mental Health; 2005. Available: www.camh.net/Research/Areas_of_research/Population_Life_Course_Studies/OSDUS/OSDUS2005_DrugDetailed_final.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 15).
  10. 10.↵
    The McCreary Centre Society. Healthy youth development: highlights from the 2003 Adolescent Health Survey III. Available: www.mcs.bc.ca/pdf/AHS-3_provincial.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 29).
  11. 11.↵
    Youth risk behavior surveillance — United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2006;55:1-108.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Duff C, Chow C, Ryan E, et al. Vancouver youth drug reporting system: 2006 preliminary findings. Vancouver: Vancouver Coastal Health; 2006.
  13. 13.↵
    Lampinen TM, McGhee D, Martin I. Increased risk of “club” drug use among gay and bisexual high school students in British Columbia. J Adolesc Health 2006;38:458-61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Martin I, Lampinen TM, McGhee D. Methamphetamine use among marginalized youth in British Columbia. Can J Public Health 2006;97:320-4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Bolding G, Hart G, Sherr L, et al. Use of crystal methamphetamine among gay men in London. Addiction 2006;101:1622-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Bungay V, Malchy L, Buxton JA, et al. Life with jib: a snapshot of street youth's use of crystal methamphetamine. Addiction Reaserch and Theory 2006;14:235-51. Available: www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Life_with_Jib__A_Snapshot_of_Street_Youth_s_Use_of_Crystal_Methamphetamine.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 15).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Saul D. Western Canadian summit on methamphetamines: bringing together practitioners, policy makers and researchers. Vancouver: Vancouver Coastal Health; 2005. Available: www.sfu.ca/dialog/Meth_Booklet_2005_Final.pdf (accessed 2008 Apr 24).
  18. 18.↵
    Goldfrank LR, FlomenbaumNE, Lewin NA, et al, editors. Goldfrank's toxicologic emergencies. 7th ed. McGraw–Hill; 2002. p. 1028.
  19. 19.↵
    Roll JM, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, et al. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1993-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    Rawson RA, McCann MJ, Flammino, et al. A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioural approaches for stimulant-dependent individuals. Addiction 2006;101:267-74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Grabowski J, Shearer J, Merrill J, et al. Agonist-like, replacement pharmacotherapy for stimulant abuse and dependence. Addict Behav 2004;29:1439-64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Srisurapanont M, Jarusuraisin N, Kittirattanapaiboon P. Treatment for amphetamine dependence and abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(4):CD003022.
  23. 23.↵
    Rawson RA, Marinelli-Casey P, Anglin MD, et al. A Multi-site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Addiction 2004;99:708-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 178 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 178, Issue 12
3 Jun 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The burden and management of crystal meth use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The burden and management of crystal meth use
Jane A. Buxton, Naomi A. Dove
CMAJ Jun 2008, 178 (12) 1537-1539; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The burden and management of crystal meth use
Jane A. Buxton, Naomi A. Dove
CMAJ Jun 2008, 178 (12) 1537-1539; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071234
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Effects of crystal meth
    • Burden of crystal meth use
    • Treatment of methamphetamine dependence
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Dans ce numéro
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Methamphetamine use in Central Germany: protocol for a qualitative study exploring requirements and challenges in healthcare from the professionals' perspective
  • Limiting production of crystal meth
  • Dangers for children in the care of drug users
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • “Superscan” in diffusion-weighted imaging with background body suppression magnetic resonance imaging
  • Using intranasal corticosteroids
  • Langerhans cell histiocytosis in a 5-month-old baby
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Public health
    • Pharmacology & toxicology

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire