Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Salon

Picture this: a new way of seeing risk

Stephen Strauss
CMAJ May 20, 2008 178 (11) 1512; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080609
Stephen Strauss BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

Conveying the statistics of risk is often a classic head butt between patient and doctor. You say: Smokers have a 50% greater chance of dying younger than non-smokers. The patient responds: Yes, but my uncle lived until he was 95 and he smoked his whole life. Well, you say, we are talking about the difference between relative and absolute risk — and patients' eyes not only glaze over, they threaten to dissolve right before you.

The solution is to show patients, as simply and effortlessly as possible, what an act, procedure or drug means in terms their own living and dying. But flashing traditional pie charts or line graphs, which demand considerable statistical sophistication to fully understand, is not going to cut it for most patients.

Enter the risk characterization theatres created by environmental scientists Erik Rifkin and Edward Bouwer to visually express risk in their new book.1 The theatre graphics are simplicity personified. Rifkin and Bouwer begin by showing the seating plans of a large public performance building, such as a theatre, concert hall or auditorium, that seats 1000 individuals. They then take the seating plan and darken a prescribed number of seats that represent the sick and/or dead, thus depicting, for example, how rofecoxib (Vioxx) use translates into cardiovascular events (Figure 1).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1: Rofecoxib (Vioxx) risk characterization theatre. The 16 darkened seats represent the number of additional people who will experience cardiovascular events when taking rofecoxib, as compared to the 1000 individuals not taking this anti-inflammatory over a 9-month period. Merck & Co. pulled rofecoxib off the market on Sept. 30, 2004, due to increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Photo by: E. Rifkin and E. Bouwer

The risk characterization theatre's graphic virtues are instantly obvious. What you get to see is what traditional stats charts never convey: the often random pattern in which diseases or conditions manifest themselves. Seating patterns show that an illness, for instance, may strike one person, while leaving their neighbour, who has the same habits, age and/or sex, alone.

The word that should be underlined is “see.” For there is something about looking at what has happened, that allows the viewer to be more emotionally convinced. You see not a nameless number but instead see the afflicted — or at least the seats they would occupy.

The theatre seating plan was almost an afterthought when writing the book say the authors. “We were in a meeting one day and we said we should have some graphic that people could look at without having to go through numbers,” says Rifkin.

But when they started looking they couldn't find a figure that let people easily see what might happen to them. Then they chanced upon the notion of using the seating charts. Initially they thought they might pick a well-known Broadway theatre for their exemplar, but that didn't work. Nonetheless, Rifkin and Bouwer, who is a professor at Johns Hopkins University, agree it might be possible personalize the graphics to fit a specific audience — say a sports stadium if the patients are mostly men.

The obvious visual impact of risk characterization theatres raises a medical communication issue central to 21st century medicine. In this era where many people are compulsively surfing the Internet to find out the latest about their condition, wouldn't it make sense for all medical papers to include a risk characterization theatre graphic to express the meaning of their findings to a lay audience? Authors wouldn't have to include the seating plan in the body of the published article directly, where the numerate medical and scientific community could readily grasp the necessary figures, stats and probability ratios. However, for patients and lay people, the journal could also post a risk characterization diagram online.

Not only would risk characterization theatres be simple for authors to generate, it would also provide a graphic standardization both lay people and the medical community could share when discussing courses of action.

In an age where computer visualization has made a picture worth a google of words, isn't it time that 21st century medicine moved from a communications model of “doctor tell” to “doctor tell and graphics show and tell”? And isn't it time for those graphics to be as standardized as a passport or a dollar bill?

Footnotes

  • Stephen Strauss wrote about science for The Globe and Mail for 25 years.

    Have you got an opinion about this article? Post your views at www.cmaj.ca. Potential Salon contributors are welcome to send a query to salon{at}cma.ca.

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    Rifkin E, Bouwer, E, Sheff B. The Illusion of Certainty: Health Benefits and Risks. London (UK): Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 178 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 178, Issue 11
20 May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Picture this: a new way of seeing risk
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Picture this: a new way of seeing risk
Stephen Strauss
CMAJ May 2008, 178 (11) 1512; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080609

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Picture this: a new way of seeing risk
Stephen Strauss
CMAJ May 2008, 178 (11) 1512; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080609
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
  • Revisiting Rodriguez
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire