Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

US Medicare will stop paying for preventable errors

Janet Brooks
CMAJ October 09, 2007 177 (8) 841-842; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.071347
Janet Brooks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association

In a major policy change projected to save lives and millions of dollars, Medicare will stop paying US hospitals to correct 8 preventable medical errors caused by their own negligence, commencing in October 2008.

Figure1

The 8 preventable medical errors that Medicare will no longer cover include retrieving objects, such as surgical tools, left in patients after surgery. Image by: Brand X Pictures

The new payment guidelines are part of a 3-year effort by Medicare, the largest health care payer in the United States, to improve care for elderly and disabled Americans. Under guidelines issued in August, Medicare will no longer pay hospitals to retrieve objects, such as sponges or surgical tools, left in patients after surgery, or to treat problems arising from air embolisms or incompatible blood transfusions. Nor will it pay the additional costs of treating bedsores developed while in the hospital, injuries caused by hospital falls, or infections arising from prolonged use of urinary and vascular catheters or after coronary artery bypass surgery.

“The overall mission of the Medicare program is changing,” said Herb Kuhn, deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. “Our efforts are focused on becoming an active purchaser, rather than a passive payer, of health care.”

The Bush administration estimates the new regulations will save $20 million annually, but others predict far greater savings. About 1.7 million Americans contract infections each year in hospitals — almost 100 000 die — with Medicare paying to treat more than 60% of them. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections alone cost $451 million annually, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Hospitals themselves will pay for the additional procedures and extended hospital stays required to fix the problems; the regulations expressly forbid them from shifting the costs to patients.

Emanating from a deficit-reduction law passed by the US Congress in 2005, the new rules require hospitals to start reporting secondary diagnoses that are present on admission for patients discharged on or after Oct. 1. Almost no US hospitals currently record such data.

Hospitals will not be reimbursed for the extra cost of treating patients who acquired conditions while in hospital.

With the help of experts, Medicare selected conditions that were considered preventable, then sought public comment on the proposed changes in May. Medicare anticipates adding 3 more conditions next year.

Private insurers are expected to follow Medicare's lead, said Susan Pisano, a vice-president of America's Health Insurance Plans, a trade group. A few US insurers already have similar policies, and “a considerable number” are mulling such changes. “Payment incentives play a good role in encouraging quality and enforcing it where it exists,” she said.

Nancy Foster, vice-president for quality and patient safety policy for the American Hospital Association, said she couldn't predict whether the changes would increase hospital costs. But when hospitals make clearly preventable errors that cause harm to patients, they shouldn't expect Medicare to pay for them, she said.

Other conditions, such as falls, are not completely preventable, Foster said. “We have lots of ways of reducing falls, but nothing approximating zero yet.”

The new reporting requirements are likely to “significantly” increase laboratory testing to determine if infections are present on admission, Foster said. But how, she asked, do physicians admitting patients distinguish between a preliminary bedsore and mere redness of skin? Hospital are also inventing data collection systems on the fly, she said. “You need to lay the groundwork, if you're going to make this a national policy.”

The American Medical Association declined to comment on the new rules, saying it had not yet reviewed them. In June, the association told Medicare that cutting payments to hospitals for treating complications that are “often a biological inevitability regardless of safe practice” was discriminatory. The proposed changes could result in delay or denial of care to vulnerable patients, including elderly patients with compromised immune systems, the association added.

“Continued access to care for these patients has already become more difficult due to the costs of care and this policy could significantly compound the problem by leading hospitals to erect barriers to admission,” it wrote.

Consumer groups generally lauded the changes. But the founder of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths, a non-profit patient advocacy group, decried the decision to strike staphylococcal aureus septicemia infections from the final list. Betsy McCaughey said Medicare's historical indifference to quality has increased costs and put patients at risk. “Hospitals aren't going to clean up until their biggest customer in this country demands it,” she said.

The new policy also drew a favourable response from heavy hitters like the New York Times, which, in an editorial, pointed to the “perversity” of a system that rewards incompetence by paying hospitals more when surgeries are complicated by infection caused by the hospitals' own sloppiness.

Medicare should also consider docking the doctors who make the mistakes, the Times argued. Ken Connor of the Center for a Just Society, a conservative Christian think tank, went even further, urging Bush to require hospitals to repay the “billions of dollars” they have received from Medicare over the decades to fix their mistakes.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 177 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 177, Issue 8
9 Oct 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
US Medicare will stop paying for preventable errors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
US Medicare will stop paying for preventable errors
Janet Brooks
CMAJ Oct 2007, 177 (8) 841-842; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071347

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
US Medicare will stop paying for preventable errors
Janet Brooks
CMAJ Oct 2007, 177 (8) 841-842; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071347
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Trudeau promises to boost federal health transfers when the pandemic is over
  • Does shaming have a place in public health?
  • Should Canada aim for #CovidZero?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire