Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Health Canada dithers while “fertility preservations” proceed

Dan Lett
CMAJ July 17, 2007 177 (2) 135-136; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070814
Dan Lett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association

A private Toronto-area fertility clinic that is offering women the chance to freeze their eggs for a decade or more is opening up a new thread in the contentious debate over fertility treatments and technology.

ESRM Biotech is the first private clinic in Canada offering to freeze either sperm or eggs for a fee. The firm has been aggressive in publicizing “fertility preservations,” which it began offering 12 months ago. The Mississauga-based clinic hosts a Web site (freezeyourclock.com), which suggests the freezing of sperm and eggs is nothing less than a new lease on life. “Consider a life where age really is nothing but a number; where today's goals at work don't derail tomorrow's priorities at home; where a biological clock isn't a ticking time bomb.”

Figure

Toronto-area clinic has now approved the freezing of gametes from 2 women. Photo by: Photos.com

Dr. Essam Michael, clinical director of ESRM Biotech, said the service is ideally suited for younger women who cannot have children right away or who believe their fertility could be compromised by other medical conditions.

The freezing of eggs or sperm when the donors are younger provides the best chance of conception later in life, he added. However, Michael agrees the service is not for everyone, and patients interested in freezing their gametes must go through a rigorous screening process. To date, Michael has only approved 2 women for the procedure, which can cost as much as $5000 for long-term cryogenic storage.

“We want to tell women clearly that having children at a younger age is really better than any fertility treatment,” Michael says. “But if somebody thinks she will not be able to have a child by age 37, this is an option.”

The freezing of eggs has been hotly debated among researchers and medical ethicists. Proponents argue the procedure puts men and women on a more level playing field when it comes to balancing career and family, by allowing women the chance to become mothers later in life.

The McGill University Reproductive Centre recently announced it had elected to freeze a woman's eggs to be used later in life by her 7-year-old daughter, who has a serious medical condition that will make her infertile.

Dr. Abby Lippman, a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at McGill, expressed concern that the long-term health effects and efficacy of freezing eggs have not yet been adequately studied. Lippman, who also chairs the Canadian Woman's Health Network, says more attention should be paid to the reasons why women cannot have children when they are younger — such as high student debt and a lack of affordable day care — instead of turning to largely untested fertility technology.

Concerns have been raised that hormone treatments needed to make women eligible for egg harvesting could have long-term health impacts that may compromise a women's fertility, Lippman added, arguing that Health Canada should move quickly and aggressively to control fertility preservation.

“If we're concerned about women becoming infertile, why are we not looking at the essential reasons that women can't have babies and men are not producing good sperm. Let's deal with the social problems first before turning to fertility treatments.”

Health Canada is currently reviewing the freezing of eggs and is developing regulations to control the technology under the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.

Michael welcomes federal regulation but would oppose any effort to dictate eligibility criteria. “If we can offer it to cancer patients, why can't we offer it to healthy women as well?” he asks.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 177 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 177, Issue 2
17 Jul 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Health Canada dithers while “fertility preservations” proceed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Health Canada dithers while “fertility preservations” proceed
Dan Lett
CMAJ Jul 2007, 177 (2) 135-136; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070814

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Health Canada dithers while “fertility preservations” proceed
Dan Lett
CMAJ Jul 2007, 177 (2) 135-136; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070814
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Providing abortions to Americans could land Canadian doctors in legal trouble — without CMPA assistance
  • Troubling rise in suicides linked with common food preservative
  • Weak SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster campaign resurrects specter of health care hesistancy
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical ethics
    • Reproductive health, infertility & pregnancy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire