Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Holiday Review

The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty

Julie Curwin
CMAJ December 04, 2007 177 (12) 1545-1546; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.071435
Julie Curwin MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Goo-ing further
    Avis R. Picton
    Posted on: 06 December 2007
  • Posted on: (6 December 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Goo-ing further
    Goo-ing further
    • Avis R. Picton

    I believe Dr. Julie Curwin is onto something with the Goo Tolerance Index method, and not just as regards choosing medical specialties. However, this system needs further tweaking before broadening its application to include other medicine-affiliated professions.

    I am a moderate-goo specialist myself (family medicine), but as a medical laboratory technologist in a previous life, I handled with equanimity not o...

    Show More

    I believe Dr. Julie Curwin is onto something with the Goo Tolerance Index method, and not just as regards choosing medical specialties. However, this system needs further tweaking before broadening its application to include other medicine-affiliated professions.

    I am a moderate-goo specialist myself (family medicine), but as a medical laboratory technologist in a previous life, I handled with equanimity not only paint cans full of week-old feces and gallon jugs of urine, but -- at a level of goo few physicians ever experience -- sinkfuls of autoclaved cultures. Yet I was undone by the routine sputum specimen and its runny cousin, saliva. Consequently, I later rejected a career in dentistry as far too goo-intensive, to the eternal detriment of my sleep and RRSP.

    To improve the accuracy of the GTI, I would propose the GSTI (Goo- Specific Tolerance Index) in its place. In my case, this would have quickly ruled out respirology and pediatrics as well.

    Avis Picton MD CCFP

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 177 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 177, Issue 12
4 Dec 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty
Julie Curwin
CMAJ Dec 2007, 177 (12) 1545-1546; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071435

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty
Julie Curwin
CMAJ Dec 2007, 177 (12) 1545-1546; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071435
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Gooiness Reference of Selected Specialties Scale (GROSSS)
    • Conclusion
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Writing about colleagues
  • Snappy answers to stupid questions: an evidence-based framework for responding to peer-review feedback
  • A report on the zombie outbreak of 2009: how mathematics can save us (no, really)
Show more Holiday Review

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire