Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Holiday Review

The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty

Julie Curwin
CMAJ December 04, 2007 177 (12) 1545-1546; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.071435
Julie Curwin MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

For most of us the holiday season is a time of good cheer — a time for feasts and merrymaking and good old-fashioned unbridled consumerism. But for senior medical students it is also a time of hand wringing and sleepless nights. Yes, for those of you who have forgotten the pain, the annual ritual of the CaRMS (Canadian Residency Matching Service) match is upon us. Applications and curricula vitae have been sent out, reference letters have been written, interviews are being arranged, and clinical clerks across the land are wrestling with the question: “What am I going to do with the rest of my life/next year?”

Figure

Image by: Alan King

I vividly remember the trauma of my own CaRMS experience: navigating the match and not at all sure what I wanted to be when I grew up, I became paranoid and applied for pretty much everything everywhere. A friend of mine even tried to convince me to apply for a urology training position.

“You might have to stand around in pee all day,” he said, “but at least you get to do it in expensive Italian loafers.”

“Thanks,” I replied, “but I'd rather have shoes that are cheap and don't stink.”

But his comment planted the seed of an idea in my head, which I have since developed into a foolproof method for helping medical students choose the right specialty. I call it the Goo Tolerance Index. It is based on 3 basic premises, all of which are founded on rigorous scientific research (or at least I asked around, and everyone seemed to think they were pretty cool):

1. The practice of medicine involves a lot of goo.

2. Goo is yucky.

3. Tolerance to goo is as good a predictor as any of what specialty one is suited for.

This is how the index works: Students are first prompted to rate their own goo tolerance on a scale of 1–10. They then consult my patented Gooiness Reference of Selected Specialties Scale (GROSSS — see next section) to find their match with an appropriate specialty. For example, because my own goo tolerance is close to zero, I chose psychiatry — a specialty where patients generally stay on their side of the desk and are never touched below the waist. (On those rare occasions when things do get gooey, the psychiatrist simply calls for a nurse or sends the patient back to his or her family physician.)

Gooiness Reference of Selected Specialties Scale (GROSSS)

Low-goo specialties (score 1–3)

Psychiatry

Very little goo is involved, unless you count emotional goo.

Radiology

Practically goo-free. You get to sit around in a sterile office all day looking at pictures of goo, but you never have to touch it. Your Italian loafers do not get stinky.

Neurology

You do have to touch people, but most of the time their bodily fluids are not leaking all over you. (If they are, call the neurosurgeon.)

Moderate-goo specialties (score 4–6)

Family medicine

Lots of mucus, earwax and toe jam, with an occasional smattering of pus and vomit. Overall, though, the goo tends to be stable and relatively odour-free. Also, it is interspersed with enough insurance forms to minimize the impact.

Internal medicine

A little gooier than family medicine. If you do not enjoy the tangy aroma of infectious diarrhea, stay away from this specialty.

Pediatrics

Patients are often very gooey and have not gained full goo-control. However, they are relatively easy to tolerate because the goo has not had 75 years to fester.

High-goo specialties (score 7–9)

All surgical specialties

Surgery is perfect for those who like to be up to their elbows in goo. When goo gets explosive — think projectile vomiting, arterial spray, or tense, pus-filled abscesses — who do you think they're going to call? (Not the psychiatrist, I can assure you.)

Note: Be wary of surgical specialties such as ophthalmology that try to fool you by assigning pretty names to their goo, such as “aqueous humour” and “vitreous humour.” Let's be honest: when a nail gun meets an eyeball, there is nothing humorous about it — it's just aqueous goo and vitreous goo.

Emergency medicine

This specialty is made worse by the fact that the goo is entirely unpredictable. The emergency physician can be relaxing with a Bratwurst sandwich one minute and picking someone's intestines off the floor the next.

Dermatology

This is a specialty for the true goo connoisseur. Dermatologists delight in taking photos of the gooiest lesions they can find, then presenting them in slide shows with catchy titles such as “101 really cool penile warts.”

Extreme-goo specialties (score ≥ 10)

Pathology

If festering abscesses and explosive melena are not gooey enough for you, this specialty is a perfect choice. Pathology is the only specialty where you get to work with decomposing, bug-infested goo and use words such as “putrefaction” and “necrosis.” Plus you get to solve murders single-handedly and hang out with all those hot-looking crime-scene investigators.

Conclusion

I believe that my Goo Tolerance Index will be a helpful tool for those of you facing the momentous decision of choosing a medical specialty. And may your gooiest memories of this holiday season be of turkey drippings, plum pudding and sloppy kisses under the mistletoe.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 177 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 177, Issue 12
4 Dec 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty
Julie Curwin
CMAJ Dec 2007, 177 (12) 1545-1546; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071435

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The Goo Tolerance Index: a foolproof method for choosing a medical specialty
Julie Curwin
CMAJ Dec 2007, 177 (12) 1545-1546; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071435
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Gooiness Reference of Selected Specialties Scale (GROSSS)
    • Conclusion
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Snappy answers to stupid questions: an evidence-based framework for responding to peer-review feedback
  • A report on the zombie outbreak of 2009: how mathematics can save us (no, really)
  • How random is the toss of a coin?
Show more Holiday Review

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire