Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Mental illness and cardiovascular mortality: searching for the links

David S. Goldbloom and Paul Kurdyak
CMAJ March 13, 2007 176 (6) 787-788; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070065
David S. Goldbloom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Kurdyak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

In the Canadian health care system, where universal access is promoted as a goal (if not a reality), we need to understand where and why such access is unequal or inequitable — the latter term implying elements of unjustness and unfairness beyond simple differences in quantity. In this issue of CMAJ, Kisely and colleagues1 report on an administrative database approach to addressing access to invasive cardiovascular and neurovascular procedures as well as rates of death from circulatory disease among patients in Nova Scotia with psychiatric disorders.

Nova Scotia has a long tradition of excellence in psychiatric epidemiology.2 The authors' sophisticated methodological approach may send some readers back to their epidemiology and biostatistics primers, but such complexity was necessary to order and interpret data from the thousands of people studied.

The prevalence of psychiatric disorders, from this database, was 15%, resembling that of other provinces. People who had had contact with health services for psychiatric problems accounted for 16% of the deaths from circulatory disease (2839/17 665) over the 7-year period studied; the age-standardized mortality-rate ratio was significantly elevated: 1.31. Of the patients who had received invasive vascular procedures, 15% overall (1685/11 218) fit the study definition of psychiatric patients, but subanalyses revealed a decreased likelihood of receiving procedures among those patients admitted to hospital for psychiatric illness or treated by psychiatrists (as opposed to primary care physicians) as outpatients.

These findings are consistent with 2 previous reports3,4 of decreased likelihood of cardiac procedures after myocardial infarction among US patients with psychiatric disorders. Interestingly, other studies have documented a striking increase in the use of health services after cardiac-related admissions to hospital by patients with depression compared with those without this disorder.5,6 It may be that the patients who are less likely to receive cardiac procedures are those with mental illnesses that are more severe and chronic in nature.

The implication of Kisely and colleagues' findings is that the difference in rates of receipt of procedures may be a contributor to increased deaths from cardiovascular causes among people with psychiatric disorders. However, to attribute an increase in deaths to a reduction in the use of cardiovascular procedures requires, at the very least, the opportunity to adjust for cardiovascular risk factors. The use of administrative data does not permit risk-factor measurement or adjustment. In patients with psychiatric disorders, the impact of cardiovascular risk factors is likely to be substantial. We already know that the presence of a concurrent psychiatric disorder, such as depression, increases rates of death from myocardial infarction.7 In addition, among people with schizophrenia, the mean 10-year risk of coronary heart disease or stroke, based on Framingham predictor variables, is significantly elevated compared with that of the general population.8,9

We also know that cigarette smoking is far more common among people with a psychiatric disorder than in the general population. Indeed, patients with schizophrenia have rates of smoking as high as 88%, with even higher rates among those admitted to hospital for schizophrenia than among outpatients. Among people with a diagnosis of depression or bipolar disorder, smoking rates may be as high as 60%, compared with less than 25% in the general population.10 Moreover, efforts to quit smoking in these patient groups are less successful than in the population at large.10 We know as well that psychotropic medications have a variety of metabolic and cardiac effects that may be additive to other factors that increase the risk of death.9 Finally, we also know that obesity, an additional risk factor, is more prevalent among people who have a psychiatric disorder.11 This database study cannot tell us the relative contribution of reduced frequencies of procedures per se to the increase in deaths.

Kisely and colleagues have revealed an inequality in the likelihood of receiving secondary prevention interventions for cardiovascular illness among people with psychiatric disorders. The huge burden of cardiovascular risk factors in this subpopulation suggests a similar, if not more striking, inequality in primary prevention. The reasons for such inequity (and the reasons underlying the higher rates of death) are undoubtedly complicated. Speculatively, they may include decreased access to specialty cardiac care, discrimination against people with a psychiatric disorder, decreased compliance with general medical care by people with psychiatric disorders (particularly among those who have paranoia), decreased consent rates for proposed invasive procedures, lifestyle factors (e.g., homelessness), socioeconomic factors or other as-yet-unidentified variables.

Note that this database study documents the receipt of procedures, which is not exactly the same as access to them. We cannot know from this study whether people with a psychiatric disorder are able to visit physicians who would make the clinical decision to recommend an invasive procedure, for example, nor how often such recommendations are accepted. Unequal access would suggest that, given the same clinical indications for an invasive vascular procedure in 2 patients, the one who also has a psychiatric disorder is less likely to obtain it. Inequitable access would suggest that this difference is not only measurable but also, in the context of the values of Canada's health care system and society, unfair.

Kisely and colleagues' data obligates us to look more closely at the entire sequence, from risk factors for circulatory disease through its symptoms, assessment and management, as well as responses (illness, disability and death) to interventions, whether lifestyle/behavioural, pharmacological or invasive. Broadly, this scrutiny needs to include the attitudes of both patients and physicians toward the physical health needs of people with psychiatric disorders. The barriers to ensuring equity in health care for people with chronic psychiatric illnesses pose a serious challenge to our notion of universality.

@ See related article, page 779

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

    Contributors: David Goldbloom and Paul Kurdyak collaborated in drafting and revising this article, and approved the final version for publication.

    Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Kisely S, Smith M, Lawrence D, et al. Inequitable access for mentally ill patients to some medically necessary procedures. CMAJ 2007;176(6):779-84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Tremblay MA. Alexander H. Leighton's and Jane Murphy's scientific contributions to psychiatric epidemiology: a personal appreciation. Transcult Psychiatry 2006;43:7-20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Druss BG, Bradford DW, Rosenheck RA, et al. Mental disorders and use of cardiovascular procedures after myocardial infarction. JAMA 2000;283:506-11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Young JK, Foster DA. Cardiovascular procedures in patients with mental disorders. JAMA 2000;283:3198-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Gravel G, et al. Depression and health-care costs during the first year following myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res 2000;48:471-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Sullivan M, Simon G, Spertus J, et al. Depression-related costs in heart failure care. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1860-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Van Melle JP, De Jonge P, Spijkerman TA, et al. Prognostive association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2004;66:814-22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    McReadie RG; Scottish Schizophrenia Lifestyle Group. Diet, smoking and cardiovascular risk in people with schizophrenia: descriptive study. Br J Psychiatry 2003;183:534-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Goff DC, Sullivan LM, McEvoy JP, et al. A comparison of ten-year cardiac risk estimates in schizophrenia patients from the CATIE study and matched controls. Schizophr Res 2005;80:45-53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Kalman D, Morisette SB, George TP. Co-morbidity of smoking and patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. Am J Addict 2005;14:106-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Newcomer JW. Medical risk in patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(suppl 9):25-30.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 176 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 176, Issue 6
13 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mental illness and cardiovascular mortality: searching for the links
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Mental illness and cardiovascular mortality: searching for the links
David S. Goldbloom, Paul Kurdyak
CMAJ Mar 2007, 176 (6) 787-788; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070065

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Mental illness and cardiovascular mortality: searching for the links
David S. Goldbloom, Paul Kurdyak
CMAJ Mar 2007, 176 (6) 787-788; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070065
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Dans ce numéro
  • Inequitable access for mentally ill patients to some medically necessary procedures
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding and the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: an ethics-based framework for shared decision-making
  • The case for relaxing no-visitor policies in hospitals during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic
  • A “No More Waves” strategy for COVID-19 in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Public health
    • Psychiatry & mental health: adult
    • Medical ethics

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire