Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

RateMDs.com nets ire of Canadian physicians

Brad Mackay
CMAJ March 13, 2007 176 (6) 754; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070239
Brad Mackay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

An American Web site that lets patients post anonymous comments about their physicians online appears to have become wildly popular in Canada in recent months. But it's provoking both fear and threats of legal action from the medical community north of the border.

California-based RateMDs.com allows users in the US and Canada to rank physicians based on 3 factors (punctuality, helpfulness and knowledge) and post written comments. The Web site owners use the information to assign a physician rating (out of a maximum total of 5) that it publishes online alongside user comments, varying from the impeccably flattering to the blisteringly negative.

Figure

Figure.

Founded 3 years ago by John Swapceinski, the free site recently gained popularity after a burst of media attention. In January, Canadians accounted for more than two-thirds of its 300 000 visitors. Nearly a third of the 65 000 North American physicians profiled on the site are Canadian.

Moreover, 5 of the top 10 most rated doctors are Canadian. One, Winnipeg pediatrician Dr. Lauri Alto, landed in fifth spot with 40 comments, 34 of which were positive.

Over 70% of comments are favourable. It's the other 30%, though, that have raised the ire of physicians. Swapceinski defends the site as a much needed forum for patients, many of whom feel powerless against the medical establishment.

“It's really easy to find [Internet} ratings for books or for iPods or even toasters,” says Swapceinski. “But when it comes to medical care there was pretty much nothing on the Internet. It was definitely a need that was waiting to be filled.”

While patients like the site, “most doctors don't like the site — we get threatened with lawsuits on pretty much a weekly basis.”

Swapceinski has also received letters from the Canadian Medical Association and the Canadian Medical Protective Association (which provides malpractice insurance to 71 000 physicians) demanding the names and IP addresses of more than a dozen individuals who have posted what they consider defamatory and/or libellous remarks. Swapceinski responded by removing 3 comments he considered offensive, but won't hand over user information without a court order. Both the Canadian Medical Association and the Canadian Medical Protective Association declined comment.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the right to speak anonymously, both in print and online, is constitutionally protected free speech. Moreover, under current American law, Web sites owners can't be held liable for comments posted on their site. But according to Vancouver lawyer Roger McConchie, the rules governing online defamation in Canada are fundamentally different and Canadian courts would have jurisdiction in cases where a libellous statement about a Canadian citizen was made on a US Web site.

In addition, Canadian courts make no distinction between libel published in a newspaper or online. Both the individual who authors the statement or the individual who arranges for its publication or republication can be held responsible.

Although nearly 6000 members of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario are rated on RateMDs.com, spokesperson Kathryn Clark says that controversy over the site isn't on the agenda. College investigations wouldn't be prompted by Internet comments, she says. The general public should look first to the College if they have a complaint with an Ontario physician, Clark added.

Swapceinski, meanwhile, says that while his site has been overwhelmed, it still isn't turning a profit despite attracting Google advertisements. Nor is he fretting about lawsuits. “I've developed a thick skin over the years because the same thing happened with RateMyProfessors.com [a precursor to RateMDs.com that he sold in 2005]. I got threatened every single week for 7 years, but we never did get sued.”

Doctors who feel unfairly judged can either respond online, or encourage their patients to post positive reviews.

“People just get hysterical. I think university professors and medical doctors have one thing in common, some of the biggest egos in the world. It's a generalization of course, but there are so many of them that can just not take criticism.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 176 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 176, Issue 6
13 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RateMDs.com nets ire of Canadian physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
RateMDs.com nets ire of Canadian physicians
Brad Mackay
CMAJ Mar 2007, 176 (6) 754; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070239

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
RateMDs.com nets ire of Canadian physicians
Brad Mackay
CMAJ Mar 2007, 176 (6) 754; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070239
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Parental Awareness and Use of Online Physician Rating Sites
  • To friend, or not to friend, that is the question ... or is it?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medicine & the law (including forensic medicine)
    • Physician health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire