Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Mixed reviews for Canada's new food guide

Margot Andresen
CMAJ March 13, 2007 176 (6) 752-753; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070240
Margot Andresen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. [email protected]
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Response to Mixed reviews for Canada�s New Food Guide
    Lynda Corby
    Posted on: 20 April 2007
  • Posted on: (20 April 2007)
    Page navigation anchor for Response to Mixed reviews for Canada�s New Food Guide
    Response to Mixed reviews for Canada�s New Food Guide
    • Lynda Corby

    Dear Editor

    I am responding to your recent article “Mixed reviews for Canada’s New Food Guide” published in CMAJ March 13, 2007: 176 (6): 752-53. Dietitians of Canada (DC) is on record as supporting Eating Well With Canada’s Food Guide as an important educational tool for promoting healthy food choices among Canadians. Criticism leveled at the Guide in this article, does not take into account the evidence that...

    Show More

    Dear Editor

    I am responding to your recent article “Mixed reviews for Canada’s New Food Guide” published in CMAJ March 13, 2007: 176 (6): 752-53. Dietitians of Canada (DC) is on record as supporting Eating Well With Canada’s Food Guide as an important educational tool for promoting healthy food choices among Canadians. Criticism leveled at the Guide in this article, does not take into account the evidence that underpins the recommendations nor the extensive consultation with a range of stakeholders, including focus testing with consumers and educators, to ensure the messaging in the Guide is understood. Speculation regarding the potential “obesogenic” nature of the Guide is also unfounded.

    • The Evidence Underpinning the Guide - The food intake pattern (describing amounts and types of food) recommended in the revised Food Guide is based on current nutritional science. The pattern has been developed to meet nutrient standards (Dietary Reference Intakes) recommended by nutrition scientists in the US and Canada and to be consistent with evidence linking food and risk of chronic diseases.

    The food intake pattern recommended for each age and gender category in the Guide was developed through an extensive modeling process that took into account the nutrition composition of representative foods in the Canadian diet, the food intake pattern for each of 16 age and gender groups and the DRI reference values for each age and gender group.

    • Consultation with stakeholders - Throughout the revision, Health Canada consulted extensively with a variety of stakeholders, including dietitians, scientists, physicians, public health experts with an interest in health and chronic disease prevention, consumers and industry. Ongoing advice and guidance came from three expert committees: an external Food Guide Advisory Committee, an Interdepartmental Working Group and the Expert Advisory Committee on Dietary Reference Intakes.

    The Food Guide also underwent two rounds of focus testing. The resource for educators and communicators and the web-based resources were also tested with end users. It is noteworthy that feedback received from this consultation did not support a focus on communicating about calories, but rather that the focus should be on strengthening the messages and practical advice on the types of foods to choose and those to limit as well as including messages on physical activity.

    • Energy Composition of the Guide - The issue of calories provided by the Food Guide pattern was carefully considered. Simulated diets that followed the food intake pattern, including the statements describing types of foods to choose within each food group, yielded satisfactory results relative to reference Estimated Energy Requirements (EERs). Reference EERs were calculated for each age and sex based on median height, weight derived from median normal BMI, and using a sedentary level of activity. A sedentary level of activity was considered most appropriate so that there was no overestimation of energy requirements.

    Guidance on how many calories any one individual would need must be dealt with carefully, preferably on an individual basis in consultation with a registered dietitian. An individual’s daily caloric requirement depends on height, weight, body composition, activity level and genetics. Focusing on calorie counting alone can result in very unhealthy dietary practices. To find a registered dietitian consult the DC public website at http://www.dietitians.ca/public/content/find_a_nutrition_professional/find_a_dietitian.asp

    Dietitians of Canada EATracker tool at www.dietitians.ca/eatracker is linked from the Health Canada website. This tool allows users to track their day's food and activity choices. It is designed to provide personalized feedback on total intake of energy and essential nutrients and compare this to what is recommended in the Food Guide and the Dietary Reference Intakes.

    The Food Guide is a fundamental tool for health educators, but it cannot be expected to meet all educational needs. It is not designed as a therapeutic diet or weight loss regimen, but rather it promotes a pattern of healthy eating and daily physical activity over a lifetime. Canadians who are the least active will have to follow the guidance closely, including the advice to limit foods and beverages that are high in calories, fat and sugar.

    Regards,

    Lynda Corby MSc, MEd, RD, FDC Director Public Affairs, Dietitians of Canada

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 176 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 176, Issue 6
13 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mixed reviews for Canada's new food guide
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Mixed reviews for Canada's new food guide
Margot Andresen
CMAJ Mar 2007, 176 (6) 752-753; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070240

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Mixed reviews for Canada's new food guide
Margot Andresen
CMAJ Mar 2007, 176 (6) 752-753; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070240
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Nutrition

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire