Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Letters

Access to abortion

James E. Read and Beverley J. Smith
CMAJ February 13, 2007 176 (4) 492-492-b; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1060175
James E. Read
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beverley J. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

If Sanda Rodgers and Jocelyn Downie1 hold that the Supreme Court decision2 establishes a positive legal right for women to have abortions, we believe that they have exaggerated the decision. But is that what they really said? The title of the editorial and its opening paragraph speak to questions of access, and we believe that the Supreme Court did speak to this matter in 1988. The existing abortion law was struck down because therapeutic abortion committees of the day were unpredictable and often unavailable. The whole structure had begun to unravel by 1988, and it's no surprise that it could not withstand a Charter challenge.

But if Rodgers and Downie are truly exercised about women's access to good medical attention around issues of “reproductive health,” we think that their net should be thrown wider. Is it only access to abortion referrals and abortion services that is wanting in Canada? How difficult is it for women to see a family physician, an obstetrician or a public health nurse for good contraceptive advice or for pre- and post-natal teaching and assessment? It troubles our conscience that our system of universal health care has isolated wait times for cataract surgery and hip replacement and plans strong guarantees that Canadians won't have to wait for these procedures, but has said nothing about access to the less exotic care that is needed by women as they make decisions about whether to have a baby.

The differences about the ethics of abortion are deep, and these differences should not be minimized. That there are health professionals who may feel bullied into compliance is disturbing. We ourselves hold conservative views, and we may never see eye-to-eye with Rodgers and Downie on the ethics of abortion. But surely we can all agree that the number of unwanted pregnancies in Canada is not a matter to celebrate. Better assured access to preconception, prenatal, obstetric, and maternal and newborn health care is something we all could make a matter of professional conscience.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Rodgers S, Downie J. Abortion: ensuring access [editorial]. CMAJ 2006;175(1):9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    R. v. Morgentaler (1988), 1 S.C.R.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 176 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 176, Issue 4
13 Feb 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Access to abortion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Access to abortion
James E. Read, Beverley J. Smith
CMAJ Feb 2007, 176 (4) 492-492-b; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1060175

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Access to abortion
James E. Read, Beverley J. Smith
CMAJ Feb 2007, 176 (4) 492-492-b; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1060175
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The 5 Ps need an update: toward a comprehensive sexual history
  • Don’t ignore perimenopause
  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Women's health (including abortion)

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire