Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term

Shiliang Liu, Robert M. Liston, K.S. Joseph, Maureen Heaman, Reg Sauve, Michael S. Kramer and ; for the Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System
CMAJ February 13, 2007 176 (4) 455-460; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060870
Shiliang Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Liston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.S. Joseph
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen Heaman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reg Sauve
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Kramer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2007 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Abstract

Background: The rate of elective primary cesarean delivery continues to rise, owing in part to the widespread perception that the procedure is of little or no risk to healthy women.

Methods: Using the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database, we carried out a retrospective population-based cohort study of all women in Canada (excluding Quebec and Manitoba) who delivered from April 1991 through March 2005. Healthy women who underwent a primary cesarean delivery for breech presentation constituted a surrogate “planned cesarean group” considered to have undergone low-risk elective cesarean delivery, for comparison with an otherwise similar group of women who had planned to deliver vaginally.

Results: The planned cesarean group comprised 46 766 women v. 2 292 420 in the planned vaginal delivery group; overall rates of severe morbidity for the entire 14-year period were 27.3 and 9.0, respectively, per 1000 deliveries. The planned cesarean group had increased postpartum risks of cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1–6.3), wound hematoma (OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.6–5.5), hysterectomy (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2–4.8), major puerperal infection (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.7–3.4), anesthetic complications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 2.0–2.6), venous thromboembolism (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5–3.2) and hemorrhage requiring hysterectomy (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2–3.8), and stayed in hospital longer (adjusted mean difference 1.47 d, 95% CI 1.46–1.49 d) than those in the planned vaginal delivery group, but a lower risk of hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8). Absolute risk increases in severe maternal morbidity rates were low (e.g., for postpartum cardiac arrest, the increase with planned cesarean delivery was 1.6 per 1000 deliveries, 95% CI 1.2–2.1). The difference in the rate of in-hospital maternal death between the 2 groups was nonsignificant (p = 0.87).

Interpretation: Although the absolute difference is small, the risks of severe maternal morbidity associated with planned cesarean delivery are higher than those associated with planned vaginal delivery. These risks should be considered by women contemplating an elective cesarean delivery and by their physicians.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 176 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 176, Issue 4
13 Feb 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term
Shiliang Liu, Robert M. Liston, K.S. Joseph, Maureen Heaman, Reg Sauve, Michael S. Kramer
CMAJ Feb 2007, 176 (4) 455-460; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060870

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term
Shiliang Liu, Robert M. Liston, K.S. Joseph, Maureen Heaman, Reg Sauve, Michael S. Kramer
CMAJ Feb 2007, 176 (4) 455-460; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060870
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Appendix 1
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Dans ce numéro
  • Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Long-term effects of caesarean delivery on health and behavioural outcomes of the mother and child in Bangladesh
  • The AEDUCATE Collaboration. Comprehensive antenatal education birth preparation programmes to reduce the rates of caesarean section in nulliparous women. Protocol for an individual participant data prospective meta-analysis
  • Mass media campaigns to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a systematic review
  • Birth and the Big Bad Wolf: Biocultural Evolution and Human Childbirth, Part 1
  • Delivery options and risk of severe acute maternal morbidity
  • Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis
  • Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Current State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Effect of second child intent on delivery mode after Chinese two child policy implementation: a cross sectional and prospective observational study of nulliparous women in Chongqing
  • Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods
  • Pregnancy in pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Anticoagulation During Pregnancy: Evolving Strategies With a Focus on Mechanical Valves
  • Determinants and trends in health facility-based deliveries and caesarean sections among married adolescent girls in Bangladesh
  • Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable
  • How Doula Care Can Advance the Goals of the Affordable Care Act: A Snapshot From New York City
  • Appropriate Use of Caesarean Section
  • Womens Perceptions of Contributory Factors for Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean
  • Family physicians who provide intrapartum care and those who do not: Very different ways of viewing childbirth
  • Impact of Cesarean Section on Neonatal Mortality Rates Among Very Preterm Infants in the United States, 2000-2003
  • Analyzing the risks of cesarean delivery
  • Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Trends in prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity in Ontario, Canada
  • COVID-19 in patients undergoing long-term dialysis in Ontario
  • Policy changes and physicians opting out from Medicare in Quebec: an interrupted time-series analysis
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Obstetrics & gynecology

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire