Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ August 29, 2006 175 (5) 548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051341
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I used to be quite secure (some might say smug) in my knowledge that I had never faced a College complaint. I prided myself on this. I thought it was representative of the kind of medicine I practised, good medicine, medicine that was above reproach. And when I read or heard about other doctors' alleged malpractice or wrong doing, I — while not exactly going so far as to condemn them as guilty — thought there must have been something wrong with them, something about their practice style, about how they conducted themselves, that left them open to accusation.

Figure1

Figure. Photo by: Fred Sebastian

Now I've been accused myself, and I'm quickly doing some backpedalling. I think my own situation unfair, that I had only the best of intentions, that the patient bears most of the responsibility for what went wrong, and that I'm just a scapegoat for a bad outcome. Now when I read of other doctors' problems I'm more understanding. I wonder about what's been left unsaid in the decision. I wonder about extenuating circumstances — perhaps the doctor had problems at home or was just having a bad day. I realize many cases are plausible, are situations I could find myself in, and I'm often left pondering whether I'd have done any different under the circumstances.

I have to face it: the likelihood is that a doctor will face a College complaint or require malpractice representation at some point in his/her career. When I tell colleagues of my own trouble, they invariably tell me of theirs. Some have had it happen to them more than once! And these are people I trust, respect and know. They tell me that it's like a rite of passage: you're not really a doctor until you've been put through this particular kind of hell.

It's a far cry from just a year ago, when I thought myself unimpeachable. Now I know I can be sued no matter how hard I try to do good. I can do everything right and reasonable and still face a complaint. And I have to admit, it makes me angry: why should I have to be put under the microscope when I feel I've done nothing wrong, when I feel the fault lies with the patient and not with me? Why doesn't the patient undergo a similar process of examination?

This can quickly, and often, turn into self-pity, where I lament that I try to be the best doctor I can and still get sued.

It's a revolutionary experience. Now my notes are impregnable; I write much more now, for fear of future litigation. At the end of all my notes I write that I advised the patient to go to Emerg if symptoms get worse. I focus more attention on protecting myself from my patients as opposed to helping them.

And always now, at the end of the day, my final thought is, “Is all of this worth it?” When I ask my colleagues how they deal with that thought, they tell me: “Getting a complaint is part of being a doctor. It's part of ensuring a system that protects patients.” In short, they tell me to grow up.

Which I'm doing.

— Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 175 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 175, Issue 5
29 Aug 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ Aug 2006, 175 (5) 548; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051341

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ Aug 2006, 175 (5) 548; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051341
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire