Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Guest Editorial

Anti-inflammatory drugs: What is safe?

Jacob Karsh
CMAJ August 29, 2006 175 (5) 449; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060881
Jacob Karsh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Some risks of the traditional NSAIDs were well known before the development of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs). Sixteen thousand deaths a year in the United States and 1900 a year in Canada were blamed on NSAID-induced gastric perforations, obstructions and bleeds. NSAID use was complicated also by numerous other side effects, including hypertension, heart failure and renal insufficiency.

The coxibs were developed as a solution to the gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of NSAIDs. Randomized controlled trials, designed to demonstrate a decreased rate of gastric perforations, obstructions and bleeds, were the first large-scale trials evaluating the safety of coxibs compared with traditional NSAIDs. Unfortunately, the GI advantages of coxibs were offset by an increased rate of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and death. These risks led to a reappraisal of the risks of traditional NSAIDs.1,2 As a result, one can no longer underestimate the risks of any cyclooxygenase inhibitor, traditional NSAID or coxib. Further, the risks are not limited to long-term use; clinically significant adverse cardiovascular events are noted within the first 30 days of treatment.

Warnings must be duly noted, but what is a doctor to do with a patient who presents with a chronic painful condition? The admonition of doing no harm cannot simply be interpreted as doing nothing. The overall risks have been estimated for populations of patients. However, for the individual patient, estimating his or her risk is the first step in deciding the best therapeutic approach for that patient.

Is an NSAID the best choice? Many regional pain syndromes are short-lived and remit with conservative measures such as relative rest, application of ice and use of acetaminophen. Treatment with an NSAID is not necessary. Acetaminophen, up to 4 g/d, is as effective as an orally administered NSAID in about 40% of patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis.

When an NSAID is required, for example in cases of advanced osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis, estimate your patient's baseline risks before starting therapy. If there is an increased risk of gastric toxicity (age > 65, previous upper GI bleed, concurrent therapy with low-dose ASA, corticosteroids or anticoagulants), consider prescribing a coxib or traditional NSAID with concurrent cytoprotection with misoprostol or a proton pump inhibitor. If your patient has had a recent myocardial infarction or episode of congestive heart failure, do not prescribe an NSAID or coxib.2 If your patient has uncontrolled hypertension, do not choose an NSAID or coxib until the blood pressure is well controlled. If the patient has controlled blood pressure that becomes elevated while taking an NSAID or coxib, even by 5 mm Hg systolic, adjust the antihypertensive medications or stop the anti-inflammatory, or both. Check for signs of fluid retention and heart failure. Monitor serum electrolyte and creatinine levels at regular patient visits.

Is there a safe NSAID or coxib? Probably not. Increased risk of cardiovascular events has been noted with all coxibs and, where data are available, with traditional NSAIDs such as diclofenac and ibuprofen. Is naproxen a safe NSAID? The absolute cardiovascular safety of naproxen is uncertain, with the generally positive results of several meta-analyses2 tempered by those of several cross-sectional studies and the suspension of ADAPT (the Alzheimer's Disease Antiinflammatory Prevention Trial) because of an elevated cardiovascular risk compared with placebo among patients taking naproxen.

Can the risk be decreased by limiting the daily dose? Dose-related cardiovascular risk has been suggested for both coxibs and traditional NSAIDs. It is reasonable to limit the dose to the lower part of the effective range (e.g., celecoxib 200 mg/d, ibuprofen 1200 mg/d, diclofenac 100 mg/d). However, no such relative safety should be assumed in high-risk patients, for whom avoidance of the drugs is the best approach. Does concomitant low-dose ASA therapy protect against cardiovascular events? There are insufficient data to show that it mitigates the cardiovascular risks of coxibs and NSAIDs and adequate data to suggest that it enhances the gastric toxicity of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Patients want effective anti-inflammatory therapy but are worried most about side effects.3 To make informed decisions and balance risks and benefits, they need accurate information about the absolute risks, not the relative risks, in clear language, preferably from their doctor and pharmacist rather than from the media.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

    Competing interests: Jacob Karsh has received speaker fees from Merck-Frosst, Pfizer and Novartis and has participated in research trials for Merck-Frosst and Novartis.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Kearney PM, Baigent C, Godwin J, et al. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMJ 2006;332:1302-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Gislason GH, Jacobsen S, Rasmussen JN, et al. Risk of death or reinfarction associated with the use of selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2006;113:2906-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Hawker GA, Katz JN, Soloman DH. The patient's perspective on the recall of Vioxx. J Rheumatol 2006;33:1082-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 175 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 175, Issue 5
29 Aug 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Anti-inflammatory drugs: What is safe?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Anti-inflammatory drugs: What is safe?
Jacob Karsh
CMAJ Aug 2006, 175 (5) 449; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060881

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Anti-inflammatory drugs: What is safe?
Jacob Karsh
CMAJ Aug 2006, 175 (5) 449; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060881
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Protecting vaccine programs and the public
  • Managing physician shortages: We are not doing enough
  • Mentally ill youth: meeting service needs
Show more Guest Editorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Drugs: adverse reactions
    • Drugs: musculoskeletal & joint
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire