Analysis
Is there another way to take account of noncompliance in randomized controlled trials?
Catherine E. Hewitt, David J. Torgerson and Jeremy N.V. Miles
CMAJ August 15, 2006 175 (4) 347; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051625
Catherine E. Hewitt
David J. Torgerson
Article Figures & Tables
Tables
In this issue
Article tools
Respond to this article
Is there another way to take account of noncompliance in randomized controlled trials?
Catherine E. Hewitt, David J. Torgerson, Jeremy N.V. Miles
CMAJ Aug 2006, 175 (4) 347; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051625
Related Articles
Cited By...
- LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial
- Evaluating how clear the questions being investigated in randomised trials are: systematic review of estimands
- How can we optimise learning from trials in child and adolescent mental health?
- Evaluation of the teaching recovery techniques community-based intervention for accompanied refugee children experiencing post-traumatic stress symptoms (Accompanied refugeeS In Sweden Trial; ASsIST): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
- Cost effectiveness of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: economic evaluation alongside the PROFHER trial
- The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort: protocol for a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design to support trials of psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions in a rare disease context
- Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the "cohort multiple randomised controlled trial" design
- Bias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done?
- Noncompliance in randomized controlled trials