Poverty, motor vehicle crashes, suicide, cardiovascular disease and diabetes are among a raft of contributory factors to higher death rates and shorter life expectancies for rural residents of Canada than their urban counterparts, according to a Canadian Institute of Health Information report.
The report, the first pan-Canadian effort to characterize the health of rural populations, says life expectancy for men born in remote, rural areas was 74.0 years in 2001, as compared to 76.8 years in urban areas (see Table 1). The differences in life expectancy for women who live in urban, suburban or rural communities are almost statistically negligible, as their life expectancy ranges from 81.3 to 81.5 years.
Table 1.
There were 792 deaths per 100 000 population in small towns as compared to 668 in urban centres between 1986 and 1996, says the report, entitled How Healthy are Rural Canadians? An Assessment of their Health Status and Health Determinants.
There's more obesity and smoking, and less recreational physical activity, in rural populations, which contribute to the higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, states the report. But rural residents do have a few advantages, including lower cancer rates, lower stress levels and a “greater sense of community belonging.”
The report also notes that death due to injury or poisoning is more of an occupational hazard in rural Canada as a result of rural-based industries like farming, fishing and logging.
Rural isolation also seems to significantly impact on suicide rates: girls under 20 are 6.5 times, and boys 4.3 times, more likely to kill themselves than their urban counterparts.
Society of Rural Physicians of Canada past president Dr. Peter Hutten-Czapski says the report reinforces the need for the government to finally implement the recommendations of the 2003 Royal Commission on the Future of Health Care to invest up to $1.5 billion on developing a national rural health strategy and various rural health initiatives.
“It does not seem there were any initiatives from the feds toward some of the challenges of rural health,”Hutten-Czapski said. “Hopefully, this will serve as an impetus, a reminder anyway, that rural citizens, many of whom actually happened to vote for the current party, are suffering and have particular needs that are not being adequately met.”
In this issue
Article tools
