Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Doubts about lutein

Ari Giligson
CMAJ February 28, 2006 174 (5) 662-662-a; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1050219
Ari Giligson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I found it amusing that in the same issue in which one of CMAJ's editors educated Steve Arshinoff about the journal's new conflict of interest policy,1,2 there is a rambling opinion piece by Sylvia Santosa and Peter Jones on the possible benefits of lutein in the eye.3 I know the journal's policy had not taken effect at the time of submission, but I feel I must respond to the article.

To date, there has been no convincing research to show lutein supplementation to be of any real use in age-related macular degeneration. The evidence that lutein can slow the progression of cataracts is spotty at best, as demonstrated by the articles that are cited in this piece. The first reference is a review article,5 albeit of the data mined from the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Although the scope and size of the Beaver Dam Eye Study are laudable, it was not really a prospective study from which causality could be established. The nutritional information in the study was gathered using questionnaires, which are always subject to recall and compliance biases. The Beaver Dam Eye Study also suffered from „multiple looks”: relationships were investigated for any and all possible population factors. The bottom line is that even though a role for lutein in treating age-related macular degeneration and cataracts was suggested in these two references, the studies don't demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship. Plausibility is an important criterion for causality but it is not a sufficient one.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Arshinoff S. Excluding the experts? [letter]. CMAJ 2005;173(8):849.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Choi S. Excluding the experts? [letter]. CMAJ 2005;173(8): 849.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Santosa S, Jones PJH. Oxidative stress in ocular disease: Does lutein play a protective role? CMAJ 2005;173(8):861-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    Krinsky NI, Landrum JT, Bone RA. Biologic mecahnisms of the protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye. Ann Rev Nutr 2003;23:171-201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Lyle BJ, Mares-Perleman JA, Klein BE, et al. Antioxidant intake and risk of incident age-related nuclear cataracts in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:801-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 5
28 Feb 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Doubts about lutein
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Doubts about lutein
Ari Giligson
CMAJ Feb 2006, 174 (5) 662-662-a; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050219

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Doubts about lutein
Ari Giligson
CMAJ Feb 2006, 174 (5) 662-662-a; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050219
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Coexisting failures do not diminish the stature of a giant
  • Dare we hope
  • Highlighting obesity as a risk factor for endometrial cancer
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Journalology & publication ethics
    • CMAJ editorial policy

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire