Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ January 31, 2006 174 (3) 418; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051530
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figure

Figure. Photo by: Fred Sebastian

We're in counselling. It was my suggestion, actually; I booked the appointment, and after a few discussions my wife agreed to go. She didn't agree immediately, I think, because she isn't sure our relationship is worth the effort. Of course, I can't read her mind, but that's what I intuit.

We sat in a room with neutral tones. Grey-blue carpet, soft leather chairs, a counsellor in his fifties who asked us standard questions, like “What do you want to get out of counselling” and “Why are you here?”

My answer was simple: “To save my marriage.” My wife's response was “I don't know.”

The counsellor teased out the particulars: I was looking for greater emotional commitment from my wife, who over the past year has pulled back to the point where she is becoming a stranger. A fact that led into my wife's point of view. She feels she can't make a greater emotional investment in our marriage because I am not engaged enough with her concerns, or with our family life.

In short, we are mutually and progressively alienating one another.

Another of the counsellor's simple diagnoses was that my wife and I don't spend enough time together. My work schedule was criticized; it is a major culprit — a fact I already knew, but hearing someone impartial say so made me accept more that I'm not “probably” working too hard, I am working too hard.

For her part, my wife's ennui was scrutinized. It came out that she has been feeling ambivalent about our relationship for over a year but hasn't decided whether to go or stay, and that this ambivalence is hard for both of us to live with.

We were cautioned against imprecision. When asked what we wanted from one another, answers like “Be more involved” or “Do more” were characterized as vague and inconcrete. “You have to know what you want in your relationship before you can know whether you're getting it.”

The most powerful statement came from my wife, who when pressed as to why she is staying in the relationship, said “I know he loves me; that's what's making this so hard. If the love wasn't there, I'd be able to leave.”

That floored me. I am glad she knows I love her, devastated that this isn't necessarily enough. Even though I knew she was thinking about leaving, hearing her say so to a stranger made it seem more real.

We were given a few practical tips, including taking time out of each day just to be with one another, sans child, sans work, sans everything. We were told to have a dinner-date once a week. But, most importantly, we were exhorted to talk about our feelings. In short, we got counsellified, and we have another appointment booked in two weeks' time. Until then, two dinner dates. Fourteen stolen moments spent together after our daughter has gone to bed. And an unscheduled number of arguments.

I'd like to say I'm hopeful. But things have been so fraught for so long that it's hard not to think, What's the point? Or, Is this worth it? But now we're going for counselling — which must mean we both have some hope. I hope.

— Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 3
31 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (3) 418; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051530

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (3) 418; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051530
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Saving the medical marriage.
  • Saving the medical marriage.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire