[The authors respond:]
In his comments on our article,1 Doug Duke usefully reminds us that the care of elderly people is complex and commonly requires a multidisciplinary approach. He cautions that, if we use tools to assign patients to a frailty category, “expediency might override fairness.” This is, of course, a concern. However, older people who are reasonably fit derive little additional benefit from complex, multidisciplinary care compared with usual care, whereas elderly people who are frail benefit greatly.2,3,4 A pragmatic, nonarbitrary way is thus needed to classify relative degrees of fitness and frailty. In addition to being useful for research purposes, the scale we described aims to meet this need.
In this issue
Article tools
Respond to this article
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Collections
