Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

A smouldering epidemic

Sally Murray
CMAJ January 31, 2006 174 (3) 309-310; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051628
Sally Murray
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The threat posed by smoking to global health is unprecedented, but so is the potential for reducing smoking-related mortality with cost-effective policies. — Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington: World Bank; 1999.

Figure

Figure 1. Image from an Australian anti-smoking campaign. Photo by: Action on Smoking and Health Australia

Use of tobacco is the second-leading cause of death in the world. It is responsible for 1 in 10 adult deaths, or more than 4.9 million deaths each year.1 If current smoking trends continue, it will kill 10 million people each year by 2020.2 Around the world, there are currently about 1.3 billion smokers; 84% of these live within developing and transitional economies.1 Tobacco is estimated to cost governments US$200 billion per year through direct health care costs and loss of productivity from death and illness; a third of these costs are borne by developing countries.2 In poor households, tobacco costs may constitute up to 10% of their total yearly household expenditure.1,2

Worldwide, people from lower socioeconomic groups, those with poor mental health (especially depression) and men and boys are 4 times more likely to smoke.3 Changes in smoking trends are, however, evident: the Global Youth Tobacco Survey showed that young girls were smoking almost as much as men,1,3 and increased smoking uptake attributed to greater female autonomy and altered work roles is predicted to take place in developing countries.3

Sex-related differences in response to tobacco (e.g., women find it harder to quit smoking and are more likely to develop aggressive lung cancer at lower levels of smoking) may also result in increased future deaths. Projections for future tobacco-related deaths are, therefore, likely underestimated.

Figure

Figure 2. Another graphic illustration from an Australian anti-smoking campaign. Photo by: Action on Smoking and Health Australia

Increased global smoking rates have resulted from many factors, such as trade liberalization; direct foreign investment; global marketing; transnational tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship; and international tobacco smuggling (for more detail, see www.who.int/tobacco/framework/background/en [accessed 2005 Dec. 15]). Reductions in tariff and nontariff trade barriers to tobacco and tobacco products have decreased tobacco prices and enabled poorer individuals to start smoking.

A concerted global effort is being directed at measures that reduce smoking uptake rates, encourage individuals to quit smoking, prevent opportunities for second-hand smoke inhalation, and control tobacco advertising and sales. Some of these measures create a dilemma for governments, which receive considerable income from sales taxes from cigarette products. It seems, however, that it is possible to have your cake and eat it too: the World Bank estimates that a 10% increase in tobacco prices would cause a 8% reduction in demand in low-income countries without a reduction in tax revenue.1 Increasing prices for tobacco has been shown to be the most cost-effective tobacco control measure.1

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 1.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WFCTC) is also gaining momentum as the world's first public health treaty (Box 1). The treaty is a binding legal instrument that addresses issues of both supply and demand related to tobacco use and control. Key elements of the treaty include restrictions on tobacco advertising, sponsorship and promotion; improved packaging and labelling of tobacco products (at least 30% of package display areas must contain clear health warnings); improved indoor clean-air controls; and strengthened legislation to cut down smuggling of tobacco. It also encourages agricultural diversification and promotion of alternative livelihoods for tobacco farmers, to reduce supply. Uniquely, the treaty encourages parties to ensure that their national laws are in line with WFCTC requirements and to work together on criminal and civil liability issues for tobacco control.

China, Brazil, India and the United States together account for two-thirds of global tobacco production. China, Brazil and India have all signed and ratified the treaty; the United States (the third-largest global exporter) has signed the treaty but not ratified it, and is therefore not legally bound to adhere to it. Other progress is evident: since signing the treaty, Tanzania has introduced a ban on smoking in public places and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has announced that it will double the price of cigarettes in order to reduce consumption (see www.who.int/features/2003/08/en).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 2.

In addition, many country and community level initiatives encourage reduced tobacco use (Box 2, Box 3). The Global Tobacco Surveillance system has been set up by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and WHO to provide data on prevalence, attitude, morbidity and mortality related to tobacco use and information on programs and policies to control it.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 3.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Esson L, Leeder SR. The millennium development goals and tobacco control: an opportunity for global partnership. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2004.
  2. 2.↵
    WHO. Why is tobacco a public health priority? A Tobacco Free Initiative; 2005. Available: www.who.int/tobacco/health_priority/en (accessed 2005 Dec 9).
  3. 3.↵
    WHO. Gender, health and tobacco. Geneva: The Organization; 2003.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 3
31 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A smouldering epidemic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A smouldering epidemic
Sally Murray
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (3) 309-310; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051628

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A smouldering epidemic
Sally Murray
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (3) 309-310; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051628
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Dans ce numéro
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A blistering variant of phlegmasia cerulea dolens from underlying squamous cell lung cancer
  • Parechovirus infections in infants
  • Radiation dermatitis in a patient treated for hepatocarcinoma
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Global health
    • Tobacco control & smoking

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire