Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Wait-time benchmarks fall short

Pauline Comeau
CMAJ January 31, 2006 174 (3) 299-300; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060009
Pauline Comeau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

New wait-time benchmarks announced Dec. 12 by the federal government were both lauded as a major shift in health care delivery and criticized for failing to set deadlines for implementation.

The announcement fulfils a promise made in the September 2004 federal/ provincial health accord to establish “evidence-based wait-time benchmarks” in 5 areas of care. The benchmark targets in all jurisdictions (except Quebec, which will develop its own plan) include: cancer radiation treatment within 4 weeks, hip fracture repair within 48 hours, hip and knee replacement surgery within 6 months, cataract surgery within 4 months for high-risk patients, breast cancer screening for women 50 to 69 every 2 years, cervical cancer screening for women 18 to 69 every 3 years; and cardiac bypass surgery within 2 to 6 weeks for those at high risk.

The announcement gives provincial governments another 2 years to set out their targets for implementing the guidelines. CMA President Dr. Ruth Collins-Nakai and spokesperson for the Wait Time Alliance (WTA) of Canada, said this deadline needs “revisiting.” In June 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down a Quebec law prohibiting private health insurance coverage (the Chaoulli decision) for procedures the public system offers. A stay on that ruling will be lifted in June, and new wait times, says Collins-Nakai, must be in place to avoid re-opening the debate.

The WTA, which was set up by the CMA and 6 specialists' organizations, released benchmarks in August 2005 that are more ambitious in some areas than the new federal guidelines. For example, the WTA included a wait of no more than 10 days for cancer radiation therapy and stipulated a maximum wait time of 30 days for MRIs and CAT scans. Both of these diagnostic procedures were left out of the new federal guidelines, leaving a big hole, according to Normand Laberge, president of the Canadian Association of Radiologists, who points out that you can't have treatment without a diagnosis.

Collins-Nakai acknowledges that “Challenges certainly remain in some specific areas in the big 5, primarily in diagnostic imaging and certain aspects of sight restoration and cardiac services.”

Still she praised the federal and provincial governments “for working together for the sake of patients,” and said the benchmarks represent “a fundamental change to a patient-centred approach.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 3
31 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Wait-time benchmarks fall short
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Wait-time benchmarks fall short
Pauline Comeau
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (3) 299-300; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Wait-time benchmarks fall short
Pauline Comeau
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (3) 299-300; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060009
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire