Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Physicians will happily adopt information technology

David Zitner
CMAJ May 23, 2006 174 (11) 1583-1584; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060470
David Zitner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue, Lapointe and Rivard1 report on their analysis of computer information system (CIS) implementations at 3 hospitals to understand better the dynamics of physicians' resistance to such implementations. The level of resistance varied. In 2 cases it was met with responses from implementers that reinforced the resistance behaviours, and the systems were eventually removed; in the other case the responses to the resistance were supportive, the resistance decreased and the system was ultimately successful.

Lapointe and Rivard suggest that an understanding of power dynamics is critical to learn why modern health information tools and techniques are not readily adopted. The slow adoption of health information systems in Canada is startling because Canada is thought of as a civilized country that often undertakes collective action around shared interests. Although an understanding of power and the relationships between various constituencies is important in a civilized society, theories of power and how power is exercised are not critical to learn why most Canadian physicians fail to adopt modern health information tools.

The well-accepted concepts in economics and psychology of incentive and reward are more than sufficient to explain many of the peculiarities of health care in Canada, including our health care system's failure to undertake actions that we all agree will benefit patients. Today's failures are easily explained by concepts developed in 1776 by the economist Adam Smith in his book The Wealth of Nations:

Whoever offers to another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this. Give me that which I want, and you shall have this which you want, is the meaning of every such offer; and it is in this manner that we obtain from one another the far greater part of those good offices which we stand in need of. It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages.

Even Adam Smith recognized that financial rewards are not the only rewards. Often, especially for the caring professions, financial rewards are less important than work satisfaction. Thoughtful administrators must consider professional and financial rewards whenever they contemplate new initiatives.

Canadian physicians have heavy caseloads and little time, and many believe they must comply with inappropriate bureaucratic rules that reduce their ability to provide effective and efficient care. The perception and reality “so much to do, so little time” leads to reduced professional satisfaction. Professional satisfaction is also reduced when physicians observe harms to patients who have to wait so long for necessary care. Physicians who spend more time recording information, in either a paper or electronic health record, have less time for patient care and often experience economic and professional repercussions.2

In each of the 3 cases examined by Lapointe and Rivard, use of the CIS meant that clinicians would need to take more time to care for a patient during a particular encounter. That the doctors felt “forced” to use the tools imposed by the hospital is not necessarily the problem. The real problem is that the tools reduced the physicians' ability to provide timely care. Usually, people who are “forced” to do things that benefit themselves do not complain. A boss who insists on a process that dramatically reduces the time to complete a job, without an effect on job satisfaction or financial compensation, is unlikely to meet resistance. On the other hand, a boss who insists that an employee do something that is not in his or her own best interests will be more likely to generate resistance.

Virtually every clinical specialty, given the opportunity, has rapidly adopted the use of a picture archiving communication system (PACS) for diagnostic imaging. PACS improves the efficiency of care because clinicians can easily retrieve and read diagnostic images, including radiographs, from anywhere in the world. There was no resistance to the implementation of the system because PACS works!

If hospitals experience resistance from clinicians after a CIS implementation, they would be wise to explore the reasons for resistance and develop strategies for success. These strategies include learning what the various stakeholders (clinicians, administrators, payers and patients) expect to gain and how the system will enhance or impair work flow. Clinicians would be less resistant if creative solutions were adopted to deal with data-entry issues. For example, giving clinicians the opportunity to dictate notes and orders and having someone else transcribe them into the system would increase efficiency and cooperation.3

Had the 2 hospitals in Lapointe and Rivard's study that encountered resistance and eventually withdrew the systems explored the reasons for failure, the implementations might have succeeded. The structure for implementation and analysis of new information technology must include experts who represent at least the most important stakeholder groups, including clinicians, administrators, payers and patients. Formal usability testing of the software using validated methods must be part of evaluations done before and after an implementation. Without such formal testing, any claims that imply that a failure to adopt the technology is due to the clinicians' state of mind as “mischievous resisters” or to a “power struggle” avoids the most important issues related to the usefulness of the software and represents an inappropriate form of prejudice. Proper usability testing, designed with stakeholder representation, ensures that clinicians, administrators and patients will not be surprised by the failure to adopt dysfunctional information technology.

Physicians are enthusiastic adopters of new technologies, including PACS, video cameras and BlackBerries. They are equally likely to adopt, enthusiastically and happily, information technology solutions that improve their own lives and the lives of their patients.

@ See related article page 1573

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

    Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ 2006;174(11):1573-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, et al. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;(12):505-16.
  3. 3.↵
    Walsh SH. The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ 2004;328:1184-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 11
23 May 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physicians will happily adopt information technology
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physicians will happily adopt information technology
David Zitner
CMAJ May 2006, 174 (11) 1583-1584; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060470

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physicians will happily adopt information technology
David Zitner
CMAJ May 2006, 174 (11) 1583-1584; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060470
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Dans ce numéro
  • Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
  • Antiracism as a foundational competency: reimagining CanMEDS through an antiracist lens
  • Keeping the front door open: ensuring access to primary care for all in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health technology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire