Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds

Anne Marie Todkill
CMAJ January 03, 2006 174 (1) 65; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1050264
Anne Marie Todkill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

[CMAJ responds:]

We agree that Plan B's nonprescription status is a step in the right direction.1 We have no interest in waging a “campaign” against pharmacists, only in examining the potential impact of mandatory counselling on individual women. Our news article on emergency levonorgestrel (Plan B)2 presents divergent points of view on behind-the-counter access, including that of the CPhA. Women we spoke to reported varying degrees of comfort with the dispensing process.

If controversy results from reporting on actual policies, so be it. The absence of direct complaints does not settle the matter; one may reasonably speculate that it indicates a general level of comfort with the dispensing procedure, but it may also reflect a lack of awareness of privacy guidelines and complaints procedures, or a reluctance to bring further attention to a transitory personal circumstance. Whatever the case may be, more than one provincial commissioner has thanked the journal for bringing this issue to their attention, and the Ontario College of Pharmacists has already agreed to revise their guidelines.3 The question of the security of data in a convenience store or supermarket is moot, as off-the-shelf availability implies that no personal information would be requested in the first place.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Emergency contraception moves behind the counter [editorial]. CMAJ; 2005;172(7):845.
  2. 2.↵
    Eggertson L, Sibbald B. Privacy issues raised over Plan B: women asked for names, addresses, sexual history. CMAJ 2005;173(12):1435-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Information and Privacy Commissioner / Ontario. Controversial morning-after pill screening form scrapped in Ontario [news release]. 2005 Dec 7.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 1
3 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter (117-124)

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds
Anne Marie Todkill
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (1) 65; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050264

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Privacy issues and Plan B: the Canadian Pharmacists Association responds
Anne Marie Todkill
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (1) 65; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050264
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Women's health (including abortion)

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire