Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

US creates blame-free adverse event reporting

Patricia Guthrie
CMAJ January 03, 2006 174 (1) 19-20; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051516
Patricia Guthrie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

New legislation that allows clinicians to disclose mistakes anonymously is expected to increase reporting of medical errors in the United States.

The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 enshrines in federal law what many hospital systems and organizations already have in place, a “root cause analysis” that scrutinizes critical incidents, reports and shares findings, and makes improvements without pointing fingers at doctors and others.

The law also prohibits employers and accrediting organizations from taking action against health care providers who disclose errors, except in cases where the law may have been broken.

The American Medical Association applauds the Act. “When physicians can report errors in a voluntary and confidential manner, everyone benefits,” says President Dr. J. Edward Hill. “This law strikes the proper balance between confidentiality and the need to ensure responsibility throughout the health care system.”

The Act, which was signed July 29, 2005, comes 6 years after the landmark Institute of Medicine (IOM) report estimated between 44 000 and 98 000 people die in US hospitals each year because of preventable medical mistakes. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System recommended a mandatory nationwide medical error reporting system.

Although such a system is still not in place, the IOM report did prompt the federal government to earmark more than $50 million for patient safety research. Health associations in about 24 states now have medical error reporting systems, which served as a template for the federal legislation.

Breaking through the so-called “wall of silence” of the American medical system hasn't been easy, say those who are trying to institute changes.

“Denial is a powerful defence mechanism,” says Jim Conway, who was hired by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston as its chief operating officer in 1995 to implement new institutional practices.

“Leaders who fail to examine the ugly mistakes that occur in their hospitals every day allow these ulcers to fester and miss the opportunity to learn and heal. Executives who believe that accidents and injuries are confidential and hidden from the troops are deeply misguided.”

In 1994, a number of media reports exposed grievous instances of medical errors, including the case of Betsy Lehman, a 39-year-old health columnist for The Boston Globe, who died at Dana-Farber after an overdose of chemotherapy. Instead of a specific total dose over 4 days, Lehman received the entire dose on each of the 4 days.

Dana-Farber invested US$11 million in new safety measures, including a computerized drug-ordering system that triggers alarms when doctors punch in potential overdoses. Conway, who now works at the non-profit Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI) in Boston, says convincing the staff that they wouldn't be fired or punished for admitting mistakes was a major hurdle.

Other industries, such as airlines, that have substantially reduced errors have all created a blame-free environment for reporting mistakes.

“We've learned that it's not that people are causing the error; it's the system,” says Charlene Hill, spokeswoman for the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

And systems fail for many reasons, says Robert Helmreich, a human factors expert who's led studies of aviation error at the University of Texas at Austin. Systemic failures, in aviation as in medicine, can arise from inadequate equipment, flawed procedures and fatigue-inducing schedules.

Individuals in the 2 professions also have a similar difficulty in coming to terms with imperfection, Helmreich says. Admitting fallibility is a first step in error prevention.

Dr. Jan Davies, a consultant to the Calgary Health Region on reporting patient harm, agrees with Helmreich.

In addition to physician's beliefs, there are practical reasons for not reporting incidents, she says. In many places it is used as a tool for performance assessment, which is a disincentive to report.

“Canada may need to start with anonymous reporting to encourage people to do it,” says Davies, a professor of anesthesiology at the University of Calgary.

“This sort of legislation is definitely a step in the right direction — as long as the results will be used to identify and correct system safety deficiences,” she adds. In Canada, similar legislation would have to originate on a provincial/ territorial basis.

Whether laws and lessons will create a safer and more open medical system in the US remains to be seen.

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health is leading the way with its new Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety and Medical Error Reduction. The centre collects and publicizes reports of medical error, employs an ombudsman to help patients and families harmed by medical mistakes and educates health care providers about the best ways to prevent errors. — Patricia Guthrie, Atlanta, Georgia

Figure

Figure. Errors involving pharmaceuticals are among the most common in US hospitals. Photo by: Comstock

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 1
3 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter (117-124)

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
US creates blame-free adverse event reporting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
US creates blame-free adverse event reporting
Patricia Guthrie
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (1) 19-20; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051516

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
US creates blame-free adverse event reporting
Patricia Guthrie
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (1) 19-20; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051516
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Global health
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire