Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ January 03, 2006 174 (1) 128; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051127
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figure1

Figure. Photo by: Anson Liaw

I'm sick of it. I'm not going to do it any more. I hereby declare that I am never going to defend medicare again.

I've had my last argument with patients in an attempt to explain why they need to wait over a year to have hip surgery, three months for a CT of the spine, six months for a knee MRI, nine months for a cardiology consult.

I used to feel responsible for having that conversation. I used to feel that I was the system representative, the gatekeeper, and that I owed it to the system to defend it. I know better now. From now on, I'll cheerily declare “the system sucks” after I inform my patients of the wait time. I think I'll be much happier that way.

After all, what purpose does it serve if I defend a system that demands patience as the user's primary virtue? Nothing will change. If their own doctors actually say that the system is broken, then perhaps patients will agitate for change.

I used to feel responsible. I used to support patients as they waited, acknowledging that it was a long time to wait but that it was best for everyone involved, that is was the price we pay for the fair distribution of resources. Now I know better. Now I know that patience is not a virtue when it comes to one's health, and that the system I have spent so long defending is indefensible.

I know this from the trenches: a patient of mine died on the angioplasty list, and two with arthritic hips jumped the joint-replacement queue by falling out of sheer pain and consequently breaking their hips. My conversion isn't really a matter of sudden insight; I just got worn down by people griping about how long it took for their investigations or interventions to happen. I said “I'm sorry” so many times that I began to wonder what I was sorry for, and if I should be sorry. Was it really my fault when I apologized to Mrs. Hendrickson after she had broken her hip? Was it really my fault when I paid my condolences to Mr. Clarke's family after he had died suddenly in the night? And was it really my fault even on a smaller scale, when patients complained about having to wait two weeks for their barium enema?

I'm not sorry any more. Nor am I an advocate of private health care; I don't think it's the saviour of the public system. I am of the Something Must Be Done school, although like most members of that school I have few concrete suggestions to offer. I am sorry for that, however.

I've sung my “the system sucks” tune for a few weeks now, and no longer do I get into arguments about whether it's appropriate that someone be made to wait months for a test. Patients for the most part seem resigned; I had expected that they'd be shocked, but it appears that they aren't fools and so are not surprised by my little ditty. But a few of them, the more tenacious ones, say, “But I could be dead by then.”

“Well, I certainly hope not,” I warble. And I add, for effect, “The system really sucks.”

We're both right.

— Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 174 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 174, Issue 1
3 Jan 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter (117-124)

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (1) 128; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051127

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ Jan 2006, 174 (1) 128; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051127
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire