Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Modelling continuous data

Murray M. Finkelstein
CMAJ September 27, 2005 173 (7) 733; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1050102
Murray M. Finkelstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Gilbert Welch and colleagues have written an interesting essay contrasting continuous and categorical approaches to modelling the relation between exposure and health effects.1 They suggest that assuming a continuous relation between exposure and outcome may produce misleading results and state that this assumption “is less the result of a considered decision than a practice born out of convention and convenience. The convention is that biologic relations ought to be smooth. … The convenience is … [in summarizing] the relation between multiple levels of exposure and the outcome in a parsimonious manner.”

The authors have not mentioned one of the more compelling reasons for using a continuous relation in modelling: the ability to smooth out sampling variability among the discrete categories. The data they used for illustrative purposes are from population-based samples. As such, there will be sampling variability associated with each category, which is conventionally presented as 95% confidence intervals on the outcome in each category. The authors have completely ignored sampling variability; they have assumed that the observed outcomes are 100% precise. Had they included error bars in their graphs of outcome data, they would probably have observed substantial uncertainty about the point estimates in each of the categories and would have been less inclined to state, for example, that “[in Fig. 1] there is a slight increase in mortality between the moderate and high adherence categories [for men].”

A well-conducted regression analysis using continuous data will include model checking to confirm that the model captures the appropriate functional form (e.g., linear v. quadratic) and is not distorted by outliers. One must bear in mind, and not be fooled by, random fluctuations from category to category.

Footnotes

  • We received no response from Dr. Welch to our invitation to reply to this letter.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. The exaggerated relations between diet, body weight and mortality: the case for a categorical data approach [editorial]. CMAJ 2005;172(7):891-5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (7)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 7
27 Sep 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Modelling continuous data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Modelling continuous data
Murray M. Finkelstein
CMAJ Sep 2005, 173 (7) 733; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050102

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Modelling continuous data
Murray M. Finkelstein
CMAJ Sep 2005, 173 (7) 733; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050102
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Succinylcholine, malignant hyperthermia and rhabdomyolysis
  • Study authors don’t consider waning SARS-CoV-2 immunity after vaccination in their model
  • The authors respond to criticisms of their model parameters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Research methods & statistics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire