Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ August 30, 2005 173 (5) 560; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050301
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Figure

Figure. Photo by: Anson Liaw

The longer I work in general practice, the more I wonder about the stigma attached to mental illness. When I suggest a diagnosis of depression to an obviously depressed patient, a typical reaction is, “Who, me? No! I'm sick, not mental. Find something else wrong with me.” Denial is a powerful force, but I'm beginning to believe it is strongest when it alights on mental illness. As per popular conception, people don't want to be mad, nuts, bonkers, loony, batty, insane or crazy. Come to think of it, it's that last word most people get stuck on.

I've dealt with the cardiac case in denial who insists on working just as hard as he did twenty years ago when he was just starting his career. I've dealt with the denial of adolescent diabetes, the refusal to believe there is a problem despite several life-threatening bouts of diabetic ketoacidosis, the umpteen admissions, and my repeated attempts to counsel and educate. And I once treated a man who refused to believe he had HIV; he felt too strong, he said, too healthy.

Yet all these conditions have one redeeming feature: they are medical, medical, medical, not mental, mental, mental. Or so my patients seem to believe and behave. It is as if having depression and needing an SSRI were less worthy — and by that token, even less desirable — than being a cancer patient and needing chemotherapy.

Once the diagnosis has been broached, significant time has passed, and a healthy amount of acceptance had been gained, further barriers must be brought down. There's the “Do I really need medication?” barrier, in which patients see the necessity for medication as some kind of moral failing or, to put it as they do, a “failure at life.” And once medication has been accepted and my depressed patients are feeling somewhat better, the invisible nature of mental illness spurs them to think they never had a problem at all, and so didn't need the medication in the first place. And so they stop taking the drugs that have been starting to make them feel better. The almost invariable result is a return of the original symptoms, making the diagnosis and need for medication even plainer. Then there's the “Do I need medication even when I've been feeling good for months?” barrier. My preference is to keep patients on antidepressants for at least six months once they are feeling well. But patients see feeling well, not taking medication, as the goal; once they have achieved their goal, they lose esteem for the treatment that brought them that far.

I know that the same behavioural phenomena arise in other diseases, but in my observation mental illness is the most difficult to contend with. This is not only because of patients' reluctance to accept therapy, but also because there just isn't the same physical representation of the illness — a broken bone, say, as opposed to feelings of hopelessness. And there's a tendency for others to blame the person with mental illness, while the patient with a fractured leg is sent Get Well Soon cards and bouquets of flowers in sympathy for their unfortunate accident.

It's a shame that my patients with mental illness don't realize they're the most courageous patients I have. When I tell them that, they look at me as if I'm crazy. And that's yet another barrier: getting them to understand how much integrity they have in trying to get well.

— Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 5
30 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (5) 560; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050301

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (5) 560; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050301
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire