Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
SynopsisS

Inexpensive CD4 counting for the developing world

David Secko
CMAJ August 30, 2005 173 (5) 478; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050945
David Secko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A massive effort is underway to increase access to antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive patients in developing countries. However, essential laboratory tests such as the measurement of CD4 T lymphocytes in the peripheral blood remain expensive to carry out. Now, new research has taken aim at this obstacle with the development of a simple and inexpensive means to count CD4 lymphocytes.1

Figure

Figure. A digital image of whole blood from a 5-month-old boy.2 Tagged CD4 T cells are displayed in yellow; CD8 T cells, in red; and monocytes, in green. The infant's absolute CD4 count, as obtained with the low-cost prototype microchip method, was 2098 cells/μL; his CD4 proportion of T cells, 0.39. Photo by: PLoS Medicine

In a patient with HIV infection, CD4 counts help determine the stage of infection, guide drug choices and indicate the patient's response to treatment and disease progression.2 In developed countries, CD4 counts for these purposes are usually determined every 3–6 months.

Flow cytometry is the standard method to reckon CD4 cell counts. In the technique, lasers excite fluorescent markers attached to cell surfaces, which allows a single type of cell to be counted in a mixture of many. The equipment, however, is expensive: US $30 000– $150 000 per machine. Add to this the costs of molecular reagents for each cell count and a technician to run the machine, and flow cytometry becomes unaffordable in the developing world.2

An inexpensive way to count CD4 cells is essential; of the people infected with HIV, over 35 million reside in developing countries. Products of previous attempts to develop other assays to measure CD4 fractions have remained technically complex or been too inaccurate for widespread use.

A microchip for counting

William Rodriguez and his colleagues recently developed a microchip-based detection system, called an electronic taste chip,3 that can detect chemicals and proteins in solution. Each chip contains microspheres in a small chamber through which fluid passes3 — whole blood, for example. The microspheres are coated with monoclonal antibodies that attach to the surface proteins of lymphocytes such as CD4 as they pass through the chamber. The chip array rests atop a fluorescent microscope connected to a charge-coupled device (CCD). The CD4 cells tagged with microspheres can be distinguished via this CCD camera and counted by computer software.

To test the system, the authors enrolled 67 HIV-positive people in Botswana: 61 adults and 6 children. CD4 counts measured by both the microchip system and standard flow cytometry ranged from 35 to 1087 cells/ μL. The microchip assay showed a bias of –50 cells/μL (95% confidence interval –81 to –20 cells/μL); its sensitivities and specificities at various CD4 cell counts are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

The microchip assay has the advantages of providing results quickly (within 15 minutes) and requires only small volumes of blood (16.5 μL). The authors suggest that the system could be pushed to operate with as little as 5 μL of blood, which can be obtained by fingerstick. Moreover, they estimate that the manufactured machine could cost under $5000, a small fraction of the price of other assay systems. They have patented the technology and are working to develop a hand-held version.

However, it is important to point out that the microchip-based CD4 cell counter is a prototype2 and requires further research in larger studies. Its actual costs are as yet unknown. Nevertheless, care of HIV-positive patients in the developing world requires a cheaper alternative for counting CD4 cells, and this microchip is a promising choice.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Rodriguez WR, Christodoulides N, Floriano PN, Graham S, Mohanty S, Dixon M, et al. A microchip CD4 counting method for HIV monitoring in resource- poor settings. PLoS Med 2005;2(7):e182.
  2. 2.↵
    Bentwich Z. CD4 measurements in patients with HIV: Are they feasible for poor settings? PLoS Med 2005;2(7):e214.
  3. 3.↵
    Goodey AP, McDevitt JT. Multishell microspheres with integrated chromatographic and detection layers for use in array sensors. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125:2870–1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 5
30 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inexpensive CD4 counting for the developing world
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inexpensive CD4 counting for the developing world
David Secko
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (5) 478; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050945

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Inexpensive CD4 counting for the developing world
David Secko
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (5) 478; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050945
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • A microchip for counting
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
  • A newborn requiring selective bronchial intubation
  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Global health
    • HIV & AIDS
    • Laboratory medicine

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire