Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Disclosure and performance: expecting more, and better

CMAJ August 30, 2005 173 (5) 457; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050985
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Those of us who start each day with that double assault on the nerves, a cup of coffee and the morning paper, are growing accustomed to bad-news stories in health care. A recent example is the revelation by reporter Barry Meier in the New York Times1 that 3 years before warnings were issued by federal regulators an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was known to have the potential to malfunction.1 The reason offered by company officials for their failure to inform patients about an electrical flaw in a small proportion of units was that publicizing the problem might do more harm than good, given the low rate of device failure and the risks of replacement surgery.2 Consequently, the option of weighing these risks for himself was never offered to 21-year-old Joshua Oukrop, who died on a cycling trip when his implanted defibrillator failed.

Although the failure of a company (and the FDA and Health Canada) to disclose information on device performance in a timely manner is deplorable and worthy of media headlines (and, one hopes, corrective action) at least performance was being monitored. When it comes to the provision of routine medical care in the hospital or office, performance is almost completely unmonitored. And what is not monitored cannot be disclosed.

Hospitals, with seriously ill patients requiring complex medical care, are particularly dangerous places. The overall incidence rate of adverse events that result in death, disability or prolonged hospital stay in Canadian hospitals is 7.5 per 100 hospital admissions, of which 37% are preventable (95% confidence interval 32.%–42%): this amounts to an estimated 70 000 serious preventable adverse events a year.3

If these figures are discomfiting to the public (and to physicians), we would do well to consider the insidious manner in which medical error and adverse events can arise. The Canadian Adverse Events Study pointed in large measure to failures in diagnosis, the prescription of contraindicated drugs and the incorrect management of organ failure.

But there are other, perhaps more common, failures that are not being monitored. These are failures to manage patients according to widely accepted standards of care. Although such failures may not result in an adverse event during a hospital stay, they place patients at increased and unnecessary risk. For example, we know that patients with acute myocardial infarction ought to receive prescriptions for β-blockers and ASA, barring specific contraindications. Some patients receive care that mirrors guideline recommendations, and others don't. This application of evidence-based standards is irregular. This is the type of amorphous quality-of-care issue that does not get much attention in the media. Nor do patients necessarily know whether or not they are receiving substandard care.

Granted, there is no precise formula for much of medical practice, which relies on each physician's ability to tailor treatment decisions to an individual patient's needs. But, for many conditions, widely accepted standards are broadly applicable across almost all patient groups. Such process-of-care standards could be implemented in hospital and ambulatory practice; adherence could be monitored and the results disclosed. Patients and the public are able to understand the nuances, to understand risk adjustments for disease severity and to use this information appropriately. More important, disclosing process and outcome results will push physicians and other health care providers to improve their scores by delivering care that more clearly reflects widely accepted standards.

In the United States, attempts are being made to monitor practice for patients with specified conditions and to accredit physicians on successfully attaining established standards in actual practice. These results are disclosed (see www.ncqa.org/PhysicianQualityReports.htm). For hospitals, monitoring is even easier than in ambulatory care: electronically accessible records of care and outcomes already exist in patient discharge summaries. By using such records, it is possible to compare performance of hospitals for several important conditions such as the management of acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, congestive heart failure and pregnancy. In the United States, standards have been developed, performance is monitored and results are disclosed (see www.jcaho.org and www.cms.hhs.gov/quality/hospital). Public disclosure has led to improvements in underperforming hospitals.4

In Canada, such data, if they exist, are not publicly disclosed. Let's not be distracted by the headlines. There is much to attend to in the day-to-day practice of medicine. — CMAJ

References

  1. 1.↵
    Meier B. Maker of heart device kept flaw from doctors. New York Times 2005 May 24;Sect A:1.
  2. 2.↵
    Steinbrook R. The controversy over Guidant's implantable defibrillators. N Engl J Med 2005;353(3):221-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170(11):1678-86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Jha AK, Li Z, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Care in US hospitals – the hospital quality alliance program. N Engl J Med 2005;353(3):265-74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 5
30 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Disclosure and performance: expecting more, and better
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Disclosure and performance: expecting more, and better
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (5) 457; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050985

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Disclosure and performance: expecting more, and better
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (5) 457; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050985
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Medical care delivery
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A focus on access to health care in Canada
  • L’avenir de la médecine est ici et vous en êtes la trame narrative
  • The future of medicine is here and you are its story
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire