Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Should patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery waiting for bypass grafting be given priority?

Helena Rexius
CMAJ August 16, 2005 173 (4) 381-382; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050815
Helena Rexius
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Insufficient capacity for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) results in waiting time before surgery, in patients being assigned to different waiting times and in risk of death among the patients who are waiting. Angina symptoms, cardiac function and extent of coronary artery disease have traditionally been used to allocate patients to groups with different waiting times.1 The impact of stenosis of the left main coronary artery on mortality and morbidity among patients waiting to undergo CABG is not clear, but in 2 large retrospective cohort studies the condition was not associated with increased waiting-time mortality.2,3 However, because patients with this condition are generally given a high clinical priority, it is unclear whether the lack of impact of waiting time found in previous studies is caused by a true low risk or is the result of adequate prioritization.

In a study published in this issue4 (see page 371), Légaré and associates investigate pre- and postoperative mortality and morbidity in a group of patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery who were scheduled to undergo CABG. The main objective was to evaluate the safety of waiting for surgery in a selected group of 561 consecutive patients assigned to 1 of 4 different waiting queues. Waiting times, upgrade to a more urgent queue and waiting longer than the time established for each queue were recorded. Postoperative outcomes were in-hospital death from any cause and a composite outcome measure that included in-hospital death from any cause, mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hours and a hospital stay of more than 9 days. Of the 561 patients, 4 (0.7%) died while waiting for surgery, 52 (9.3%) were upgraded to a more urgent queue and 147 (26.2%) waited longer than the standard times for their respective queue. The overall in-hospital mortality was 5.5% and did not differ significantly between the different queues. The composite outcome occurred in 32.6% of the patients. Independent risk factors for the composite outcome included age greater than 70 years, preoperative renal failure, left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%, myocardial infarction in the 7 days before surgery and stenosis of left main artery greater than 70%, but did not include queue assignment. The authors conclude that waiting for surgery with stenosis of the left main artery is safe and not associated with increased pre- or postoperative mortality or morbidity.

Légaré and colleagues should be recognized for their effort to shed light on this difficult issue. The investigation includes a large, consecutive and well-defined patient population, and the follow-up is accomplished thoroughly and with only a small amount of missing data. In this field, we have to rely on results from well-performed descriptive studies, since it is impossible to perform prospective randomized trials.

However, 2 issues are worth discussing. The first is whether patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery have an increased risk of death in any category of waiting list. The authors state that the preoperative mortality of 0.7% among this group is low. This statement would be considerably stronger if the mortality was compared with that of a matched control group of patients without the condition or if mortality was related to waiting time. By relating the number of deaths to the time at risk, in this case the total patient time spent in the queue, a case-fatality rate can be calculated. The mean waiting time is not specified in the manuscript, but if we assume that it was equivalent to the median waiting time given in Table 2, the case-fatality rate would be 4 deaths per 18 patient years on the waiting list or 23 deaths per 100 patient years. This rate is markedly higher than that previously reported from waiting list registers (4–8 deaths per 100 patient years)3,5,6,7 and does not support the statement that waiting-time mortality is low for patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery. The low event rate, however, makes comparisons difficult, and even larger patient populations are required to demonstrate differences in case-fatality rates.

The second issue is whether postoperative morbidity and mortality are influenced by stenosis of the left main coronary artery. In most previous studies, no association has been found.8,9 Neither has an association been found when waiting time is expressed as a continuous variable or when patients are operated on within the intended waiting time.10,11 The findings of the current study thus support those of previous investigations.

Even if the results of this study suggest prolonged waiting time does not worsen postoperative outcomes in patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery, it remains essential to keep the waiting time short to reduce the risk while waiting and thus the total risk for patients accepted for CABG.

𝛃 See related article page 371

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Naylor CD, Baigrie RS, Goldman BS, Basinski A. Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures. Revascularisation Panel and Consensus Methods Group. Lancet 1990;335:1070-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Morgan CD, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Analysis of deaths while waiting for cardiac surgery among 29,293 consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada. The Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Heart 1998;79:345-9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Rexius H, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Oden A, Jeppsson A. Mortality on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass grafting: incidence and risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:769-74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Légaré JF, MacLean A, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA. Assessing the risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery. CMAJ 2005;173(4):371-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Koomen EM, Hutten BA, Kelder JC, Redekop WK, Tijssen JG, Kingma JH. Morbidity and mortality in patients waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:260-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Plomp J, Redekop WK, Dekker FW, van Geldorp TR, Haalebos MM, Jambroes G, et al. Death on the waiting list for cardiac surgery in The Netherlands in 1994 and 1995. Heart 1999;81:593-7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Suttorp MJ, Kingma JH, Vos J, Koomen EM, Tijssen JG, Vermeulen FE, et al. Determinants for early mortality in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a case-control study. Eur Heart J 1992;13:238-42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Corbineau H, Lebreton H, Langanay T, Logeais Y, Leguerrier A. Prospective evaluation of coronary arteries: influence on operative risk in coronary artery surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:429-34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Gol MK, Ozsoyler I, Sener E, Goksel S, Saritas A, Tasdemir O, et al. Is left main coronary artery stenosis a risk factor for early mortality in coronary artery surgery? J Card Surg 2000;15:217-22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Ray AA, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA, Johnstone DE, Hirsch GM. Waiting for cardiac surgery: results of a risk-stratified queuing process. Circulation 2001;104(Suppl 1):I92-8.
  11. 11.↵
    Rexius H, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Oden A, Jeppsson A. Waiting time and mortality after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:538-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 4
16 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery waiting for bypass grafting be given priority?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery waiting for bypass grafting be given priority?
Helena Rexius
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (4) 381-382; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050815

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Should patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery waiting for bypass grafting be given priority?
Helena Rexius
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (4) 381-382; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050815
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Assessing the risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Not neutral: reimagining antiracism as a professional competence
  • Transforming race-based health research in Canada
  • Time to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism in medicine in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Cardiothoracic surgery
    • Cardiology: ischemic heart disease

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire