Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Time-dependent analysis in CHF follow-up

Justin A. Ezekowitz, Paul W. Armstrong, Padma Kaul, Finlay A. McAlister and Carl Van Walraven
CMAJ August 02, 2005 173 (3) 239; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1050087
Justin A. Ezekowitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul W. Armstrong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Padma Kaul
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Finlay A. McAlister
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Van Walraven
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Murray Finkelstein is appropriately concerned about including postevent outcomes in a regression model. This would result in biased associations, namely, the inability to determine if the predictive factor resulted in the event or if the event resulted in the predictive factor. This has been called “survivor-treatment selection bias”1 or, more generically, “time-dependent bias” and is relatively common even in highly cited medical journals. In a recent systematic review,2 we found that 18.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8%–21.8%) of studies with a survival analysis contained a time-dependent factor and that 40.9% (95% CI 32.3%–50.0%) of these studies were susceptible to time- dependent bias.

However, we strongly disagree that our Cox model was performed incorrectly, since it was corrected for this bias. As stated in the Methods section, we adjusted for the appropriate time-dependent variables and did have a variable expressing time spent in hospital up to that time.3 Our Results section summarizes the findings. The phrase “within 1 year after discharge” used there refers to the censoring time that we used for all analyses in the study. We did not use any “future information” and our methodology was robust.

In the Methods section, we note that we performed a sensitivity analysis using all outpatient visits rather than cardiovascular visits to define our groups; however, the results of this analysis were omitted by the journal because of space limitations. Using the same variables as in Table 3 but with all visits rather than cardiovascular visits, we found similar results: compared with those who had no outpatient visits, patients seen by a family physician (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.96) or a specialist and family physician (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40–0.58) had lower mortality rates. Furthermore, similar results were obtained with the Cox model when all visits instead of cardiovascular visits were used: seeing a specialist was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.94–0.96).

References

  1. 1.↵
    Glesby MJ, Hoover DR. Survivor treatment selection bias in observational studies: examples from the AIDS literature. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:999-1005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Van Walraven C, Davis D, Forster AJ, Wells GA. Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:672-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Ezekowitz JA, van Walraven C, McAlister FA, Armstrong PA, Kaul P. Impact of specialist follow-up in outpatients with congestive heart failure. CMAJ 2005;172(2):189-94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 3
2 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time-dependent analysis in CHF follow-up
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Time-dependent analysis in CHF follow-up
Justin A. Ezekowitz, Paul W. Armstrong, Padma Kaul, Finlay A. McAlister, Carl Van Walraven
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (3) 239; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050087

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Time-dependent analysis in CHF follow-up
Justin A. Ezekowitz, Paul W. Armstrong, Padma Kaul, Finlay A. McAlister, Carl Van Walraven
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (3) 239; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1050087
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
  • Beyond wastewater surveillance: refining environmental pathogen detection in the built environment
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Cardiology: heart failure

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire