Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Private medical care comes to Canada

CMAJ August 02, 2005 173 (3) 225; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050864
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Supreme Court's decision to strike down Quebec's laws prohibiting commerce in private health insurance should not be narrowly interpreted. By logical (and perhaps legal) extension, provincial laws that effectively prohibit physicians from practising in the private sector (through opt-out legislation, for example) are likely to be ruled invalid also. There is no use permitting private medical insurance but forbidding physicians to provide private care. Lawrie McFarlane, a former deputy minister of health for British Columbia, comments that the decision poses an “imminent threat of a two-tier system” (page 269).1

Figure

Figure. Photo by: Fred Sebastian

The Supreme Court ruling on what it judged a waiting time that was unreasonable and potentially harmful to a single patient is in fact a broad condemnation of medicare, a system that is failing to deliver despite recent federal injections of Can$41 billion. Canada also ranks among the highest-spending nations on health care per capita. Is the problem simply insufficient resources, or is it, as Romanow, Kirby and others have reported, also, and perhaps mainly, inefficiency, mismanagement and professional self-interest? Physicians are at the vortex of the system and this crisis: Are we responsible?

In responding to the Supreme Court's decision, federal Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh will have to make some tough decisions. But the provincial medical associations and the CMA also face complex and difficult challenges: the profession is deeply divided about two-tier health care. The case that triggered the Supreme Court decision was brought by a physician who was prohibited from opening a private health care facility. He is not alone among physicians. Others, however, are just as strongly committed to a single-tier system. In the face of such profound ambivalence, debate within the profession must be frank, not fogged with politeness and generalities. Steven Lewis, a health policy expert, lays out starkly the case that organized medicine is largely responsible for the crisis in medicare that resulted in the Supreme Court decision (page 275).2 Albert Schumacher, President of the CMA, defends the profession's record and outlines the perspective of the association and its members (pages 277).3

Responsibility and future roles aside, it is very likely, in our view, that a public–private mix of medical care will be the end result. What might it look like? With a two-tier system Canada would join Australia and countries in Europe and elsewhere where public and private health care coexist. We asked Richard Smith, former editor of BMJ and now chief executive of UnitedHealth Europe, a company that markets private services in Europe to over 50 million people, to comment from both his long editorial experience and his current corporate viewpoint (page 273).4

Lastly, why did patient George Zeliotis have to wait so long for his elective orthopedic surgery before seeking recourse through the courts? What is wrong with waiting lists, particularly those for elective surgery? David Hadorn, former research director of the Western Canada Waiting List Project, considers questions of priority on waiting lists, reviews the widely divergent opinions of physicians, patients and the public on what constitutes a reasonable amount of time to wait and then outlines how the private sector can and likely will increase efficiency by, among other things, using nonphysician clinical assistants for some of the routine tasks common in elective surgery (page 271).5

Private health care for elective surgical and some diagnostic procedures is certain to follow the Supreme Court decision. The high court allows no appeal. Let the grand experiment begin. — CMAJ

References

  1. 1.↵
    McFarlane L. Supreme Court slaps for-sale sign on medicare. CMAJ 2005;173(3):269-70.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Lewis S. Physicians, it's in your court now. CMAJ 2005;173(3):275-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Schumacher A. Doctors put patients first in health care debate. CMAJ 2005;173(3):277-8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Smith R. The private sector in the English NHS: from pariah to saviour in under a decade. CMAJ 2005;173(3):273-4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Hadorn D. The Chaoulli challenge: getting a grip on waiting lists. CMAJ 2005;173(3):271-3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 173 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 173, Issue 3
2 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Private medical care comes to Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Private medical care comes to Canada
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (3) 225; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050864

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Private medical care comes to Canada
CMAJ Aug 2005, 173 (3) 225; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050864
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Extending the impact of CMAJ
  • La vaccination contre le SRAS-CoV-2 devrait être obligatoire pour exercer la médecine au Canada
  • Reconstruire de façon plus équitable
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health care coverage

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire