Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Query

Query

CMAJ April 12, 2005 172 (8) 1144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050221
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I can remember my time in medical school — decidedly unhalcyon days — when, at the behest of my attending, I, a lowly clerk, would call specialists in the hospital and ask them to see patients on our ward. I was quite bad at this. I took too long to give pertinent details, digressed, repeated physical findings … more than once I was cut off and asked to simply give the name and location of the patient. Click.

Figure1

Figure. Photo by: Anson Liaw

I've since gotten better at the art of referral. The formula is actually quite simple: say the patient's name first, then his or her age, then where I'm calling from, then the reason for the consult (query appendicitis, say, or query Guillain–Barré) and then give a streamlined history and any positive findings on physical exam.

This approach usually works; I can honestly say that most specialists I call are attentive, collegial and accommodating at seeing our sick patient at the soonest possible moment. My appendicitises and Guillain–Barrés and complicated fractures get seen the same day, as they should be. Yet every once in a while I encounter an attitude I've come to detest. The attitude is: Go away, I'm too busy for this.

This attitude oozes into silences and pauses; it leaks from the phone like radiation. Such specialists ask for silly details to put you off balance, enquiring about trivia like adductor pain and a psoas sign when the history and abdominal exam are classic for appendicitis, or for tuning-fork vibrational sense when it's clear the patient has loss of distal muscle tone and sensation. Or they ask a battery of irrelevant questions designed to make you feel remiss and confirm a power differential: I ask the questions around here, you answer them.

My bottom line is this: I think my patient needs to be seen by the consultant, and that really should be enough. I'm open to CME but it shouldn't come in the form of knowledge abuse. I know the specialist is entitled to ask questions, and should ask questions, to better triage and differentiate the case; yet such a process should not involve taking perverse enjoyment in making the family physician squirm. Some of those I consult are indeed very busy, far busier than me; the wait to see a neurologist in my environs is over a year. Yet the backlog isn't an excuse for such behaviour.

I've dealt with this problem long enough to develop a strategy to salvage consults that start to go awry. Now I say, “Dr. X, I'm sorry, but we seem to have got off on the wrong foot. I don't call you very often, and I never call unless I think there is something wrong. If I thought this could wait, then I would have tried to book the patient into your clinic. But I think the problem is worrying enough that you should see this patient now.”

As soon as I communicate that I am worried about the patient, the tone of the conversation changes. It lifts us both out of the FP–consultant vortex and onto common ground: concern for the patient, the frontier on which all physicians can unite. — Dr. Ursus

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 172 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 172, Issue 8
12 Apr 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter (1133 - 1140)

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Query
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Query
CMAJ Apr 2005, 172 (8) 1144; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050221

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Query
CMAJ Apr 2005, 172 (8) 1144; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050221
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Query
  • Query
  • Query
Show more Query

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire