Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
SynopsisI

Is blood transfusion harmful in patients with acute coronary syndromes?

Adel Al-Sarraf and Robert A. Fowler
CMAJ January 18, 2005 172 (2) 182; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041736
Adel Al-Sarraf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A. Fowler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2005 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Rao SV, Jollis JG, Harrington RA, Granger CB, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2004; 292 (13): 1555-62.

Background: There is uncertainty regarding the benefit of blood transfusions in anemic patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Design: This observational study analyzed clinical outcomes of 24 112 patients who had previously participated in 3 large multicentre randomized clinical trials. Each of the 3 trials had randomly assigned patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive different anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapies. The authors examined the association between transfusion and the primary outcome of 30-day mortality and the secondary composite outcome of 30-day mortality or myocardial infarction.

Results: Of the 24 112 patients, 2401 (10.0%) received a blood transfusion. Compared with patients who did not receive a transfusion, those who did were more likely to be older, female, black, have been treated at a hospital in the United States, have more comorbidities at presentation and have a lower baseline and nadir hematocrit. The authors found that patients who received blood had worse outcomes than those who did not receive blood (Table 1) and that the predicted probability of death within 30 days was most pronounced among transfused patients with a nadir hematocrit greater than 25%.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

Commentary: The authors of this study found that blood transfusion was associated with an increased risk of death within 30 days among patients with acute coronary syndromes and that the risk was most pronounced when transfusions were administered to patients with a hematocrit greater than 25%.

The largest randomized clinical trial of blood transfusion in critically ill patients concluded that a restrictive transfusion strategy was at least as good as, and possibly superior to, a liberal transfusion strategy.1 In a subgroup analysis of patients with cardiac disease, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes.1 However, in a subsequent observational study involving older patients admitted to hospital with myocardial infarction, Wu and colleagues2 reported a lower 30-day mortality among patients who received a transfusion and had an admission hematocrit of less than 33% than among those who received a transfusion and had a higher hematocrit. Both the study by Wu and colleagues and the current study by Rao and colleagues are limited by their observational nature, an inability to measure and adjust for all potential confounding variables and effect modifiers, and an inability to determine a causal relation between blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Practice implications: The current evidence suggests that blood transfusions are unlikely to be beneficial when the hemoglobin concentration exceeds 100 g/L (hematocrit > 30%) in the absence of active blood loss. However, the benefits of transfusion may exceed the risks when the hemoglobin concentration falls to 70 g/L (hematocrit < 21%). Controversy remains for transfusion between these hemoglobin levels. A randomized clinical trial is needed to help elucidate which patients with acute coronary syndromes should receive blood transfusions and to what extent.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340 (6): 409-17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Wu WC, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1230-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 172 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 172, Issue 2
18 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is blood transfusion harmful in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is blood transfusion harmful in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Adel Al-Sarraf, Robert A. Fowler
CMAJ Jan 2005, 172 (2) 182; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041736

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Is blood transfusion harmful in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Adel Al-Sarraf, Robert A. Fowler
CMAJ Jan 2005, 172 (2) 182; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041736
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
  • A newborn requiring selective bronchial intubation
  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Hematology & transfusion medicine
    • Cardiology: ischemic heart disease

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire