Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Neural tube defects

Fu-Lin Wang, Hude Quan and Donald Schopflocher
CMAJ January 18, 2005 172 (2) 158; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041688
Fu-Lin Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hude Quan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald Schopflocher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2005 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Although Joel Ray and associates1 may have adequately controlled for confounding in their study of neural tube defects among children born in Ontario, the study may suffer from bias in data collection, analysis and interpretation, and the conclusions drawn may therefore be premature.

The study included Ontario women who underwent antenatal maternal serum screening at 15 to 20 weeks' gestation over the period 1994 to 2000, with an uptake rate of about 70%.1 The proportion of First Nations women in the study (1551/403 915, 0.38%) was much lower than the proportion of First Nations women in Ontario, as estimated by the 2001 Census (92 050 or 1.9% of the total female population).2 Because First Nations women tend to have a higher fertility rate, the true proportion of pregnant women of First Nations origin in Ontario is likely at least 5 times the proportion reported in the study. As reported by others3 and in our previous analysis,4 First Nations women are less likely to access prenatal care and more likely to access it at a later stage of pregnancy than women in the general population. Therefore, Ray and associates probably missed a large number of First Nations women in Ontario who did not access maternal serum screening before 20 weeks' gestation. Failure to include all pregnant First Nations women in this study, particularly in the denominator for a risk calculation, could lead to overestimation of the risk for neural tube defects among pregnant First Nations women in Ontario.

Using population-based registry data from the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System combined with data from the Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan, which captures nearly all First Nations persons in Alberta with treaty status under the Indian Act of Canada, we examined the live-birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in 268 167 newborns, including 16 986 First Nations children, from 1995 to 2001.5 We found 4 cases of neural tube defects, a rate of 0.24 per 1000 First Nations newborns (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.47). This result was similar to the rate for other Alberta newborns (0.33 per 1000, 95% CI 0.25–0.40). Thus, we did not witness a greater risk of neural tube defects for First Nations newborns. Our finding is consistent with that of an earlier report with a much larger sample size in British Columbia.6

Our data show that pregnancy terminations and stillbirths account for about 50% of all cases of neural tube defects registered in Alberta between 1997 and 2001. However, data on ethnicity are currently unavailable for cases of termination and stillbirth. Future collection of such data will allow a better estimation of the risk for neural tube defects among First Nations people and people of other ethnic origins.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Meier C, Cole DEC, Wyatt PR. Maternal ethnicity and risk of neural tube defects: a population-based study. CMAJ 2004; 171(4):343-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Ethnic origin, sex and single and multiple responses for population, for Canada, provinces, territories, census metropolitan areas and agglomerations, 2001 Census – 20% sample data. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2003 Jan 21. Cat no. 97F0010XCB01001.
  3. 3.↵
    Plunkett A, Lancaster P, Huang J; National Perinatal Statistics Unit (Australia). Indigenous mothers and their babies, Australia 1991–1993. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 1996.
  4. 4.↵
    Wang FL, Larke B, Hanrahan A, Guyon G, Findlay L, Gabos S. Non-acceptance to HIV testing in a routine prenatal HIV screening program [poster]. International Epidemiological Association; 16th World Congress of Epidemiology; 2002 Aug 18–22; Montréal.
  5. 5.↵
    Wang FL, Lowry RB, Quan H, Sibbald BS, Nguyen TH, Schopflocher D, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in Chinese, First Nations, Vietnamese, and Hutterites newborns, Alberta, 1995–2001 [oral presentation]. 2nd scientific meeting of Canadian Congenital Anomalies Surveillance Network; 2003 Oct 19–21; Edmonton.
  6. 6.↵
    Lowry RB, Thunem NY, Silver M. Congenital anomalies in American Indians of British Columbia. Genet Epidemiol 1986;3:455-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 172 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 172, Issue 2
18 Jan 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neural tube defects
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Neural tube defects
Fu-Lin Wang, Hude Quan, Donald Schopflocher
CMAJ Jan 2005, 172 (2) 158; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041688

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Neural tube defects
Fu-Lin Wang, Hude Quan, Donald Schopflocher
CMAJ Jan 2005, 172 (2) 158; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041688
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Succinylcholine, malignant hyperthermia and rhabdomyolysis
  • Study authors don’t consider waning SARS-CoV-2 immunity after vaccination in their model
  • The authors respond to criticisms of their model parameters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Addiction medicine
    • Drugs: urogenital

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire