Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
SynopsisF

Ottawa to combine smart regulation and precaution

Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ June 07, 2005 172 (12) 1544-1544-a; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050568
Barbara Sibbald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors

Ottawa's plan to modernize health and safety regulations has raised concerns that this may be an industry-driven step toward deregulation.

The Smart Regulation initiative, which the public service will present to the federal government for approval this winter, will guide federal health and safety regulations pertaining to everything from pharmaceuticals to agricultural seeds. Intended to modernize the regulatory system, it is also designed to “foster an economic climate that promotes innovation and investment.” The initiative's guiding principles include effectiveness, cost-efficiency, timeliness, transparency, accountability and performance.

Critics, such as members of the Canadian Health Coalition (a public health system advocacy group) who hosted a May 9 conference where the regulations were discussed, say they are step toward deregulation. They contend that public safety will be subservient to economic goals.

Ken Moore, a senior analyst with the Privy Council Office, acknowledged a “tension” between the “notion of precaution and public protection versus stimulating innovation and economic prosperity.” He added: “We're very conscious of these tensions.”

Within the “smart” regulation framework, the precautionary principle will be used as a risk management tool, Moore said. The principle “recognizes that the absence of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing decisions where there is a risk of serious or irreversible harm.”

Consultations over the next few months will try to determine Canadians' “values and risk tolerance,” Moore said.

But University of Victoria bioethicist Conrad Brunk told the conference these tensions are irreconcilable because they are based on “conflicting values.” For example, “if the value is promotion of technological innovation, then this means cutting the regulatory requirements and facilitating this innovation.”

While the Smart Regulation initiative emphasizes timeliness, the precautionary principle requires science to understand the risks, and this takes time. “The government should choose one guiding principle or another,” said Brunk.

Precautionary values should be entrenched in the regulation, he added. These values have to be “reflected in specific language [or] it could very well be a deregulatory process.”

“The whole process is driven by the innovation agenda,” he added.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 172 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 172, Issue 12
7 Jun 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ottawa to combine smart regulation and precaution
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ottawa to combine smart regulation and precaution
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Jun 2005, 172 (12) 1544-1544-a; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050568

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ottawa to combine smart regulation and precaution
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Jun 2005, 172 (12) 1544-1544-a; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050568
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
  • A newborn requiring selective bronchial intubation
  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire