Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
SynopsisH

C. difficile strain 20 times more virulent

Laura Eggertson
CMAJ May 10, 2005 172 (10) 1279; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050470
Laura Eggertson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors

The strain of Clostridium difficile circulating in Quebec and reported in CMAJ last year [171:19-21] was associated with a greater severity of illness than is typical of the organism.

Evidence presented at the Apr. 11, 2005, meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America demonstrates the C. difficile strain in Quebec produced 20 times the levels of toxins A and B than previously studied strains.

“The ability of this emerging strain to produce high levels of toxins A and B in the laboratory may explain its virulence in patients,” says Michel Warny, director of bacterial process development for Cambridge, Mass.– based Acambis.

Dr. Jacques Pépin, an infectious disease expert at the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS) and a coauthor of the study, says the research “just confirms what clinicians had been seeing for the last couple of years.” Acambis is developing a vaccine against C. difficile and worked with the US Centers for Disease Control, using samples from Sherbrooke patients.

The hypervirulent strain is identical to one that caused outbreaks in hospitals in 6 US states. It has also been identified at Toronto's Princess Margaret Hospital, where it caused a cluster of cases and a death last fall.

Although the US outbreak was sizeable, hospitals were able to bring it under control more quickly. Almost 2 years after the outbreak began in Quebec, hospitals still experience cases caused by the same strain.

“The question is why did it reach such dramatic proportions here?” Pépin asks. “I think it has to do with the decay of our hospital infrastructure.”

Earlier this year, the Quebec Ministry of Health allocated $20 million for infection control at affected hospitals. The Sherbrooke region got $900 000. Most of it was spent on bills for measures implemented in the previous 6 months, Pépin says.

This past winter, the CHUS had a third to half the number of cases, compared with the previous 2 years, when 100 patients died, says Pépin. But the proportion of people who required colectomies or died has remained the same, he says.

“I think this hypervirulent strain is more transmissible than other strains,” he says. “I don't see why it would go away — I think it's going to stay here.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 172 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 172, Issue 10
10 May 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
C. difficile strain 20 times more virulent
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
C. difficile strain 20 times more virulent
Laura Eggertson
CMAJ May 2005, 172 (10) 1279; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050470

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
C. difficile strain 20 times more virulent
Laura Eggertson
CMAJ May 2005, 172 (10) 1279; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050470
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Prescription drug expenditures rising -- too fast?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
  • A newborn requiring selective bronchial intubation
  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Gastroenterology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire