Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
SynopsisC

$10-million malpractice award largest ever

Louise Gagnon
CMAJ October 26, 2004 171 (9) 1031; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041577
Louise Gagnon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

The largest medical malpractice award in Canada is “an isolated case” and will not set a precedent for similar malpractice cases in the future, says the president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC).

In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld an Ontario Superior Court decision that will see a Smith Falls family receive more than $10 million to compensate for the 1983 delivery of their daughter, who suffered brain damage at birth because of a lack of oxygen. The daughter, now a non-verbal quadriplegic with cerebral palsy, had her shoulder lodged in the birth canal after induction. Physicians eventually freed her after about 15 minutes, but she was born limp and not breathing.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Denis Power ruled that the injuries the baby suffered were the result of negligence on the part of the physicians. He noted that the physicians should have recognized that the pregnancy was high risk because of the presence of gestational diabetes and should have referred the mother to an obstetrics specialist.

The family physicians involved in the case, Dr. Brian J. Penny and Dr. Greg Healey, and the managers at the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA), have 60 days from the time of the Sept. 10 ruling to file an appeal.

“This decision won't change the way we practise medicine,” said SOGC President Dr. Gerry Stanimir, a Montreal-based obstetrician-gynecologist. “As a group of physicians, we practise evidence-based medicine and deliver 80 000 babies a year. One case will not change the way we practice medicine.”

Stanimir says the physicians involved performed to the best of their ability and met the standards of practise at the time.

“It was a difficult case [delivery],” said Stanimir, noting it was an 11-pound baby whose mother had been diagnosed with gestational diabetes. “They followed the standards of care and did perform the best they could, given the circumstances at the time.”

The CMPA declined to comment on the case. — Louise Gagnon, Ottawa

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 171 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 171, Issue 9
26 Oct 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
$10-million malpractice award largest ever
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
$10-million malpractice award largest ever
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ Oct 2004, 171 (9) 1031; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041577

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
$10-million malpractice award largest ever
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ Oct 2004, 171 (9) 1031; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041577
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
  • The changing ecology of avian flu
  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire