- © 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors
Over the past 15 years, hospital chart reviews, as used by Ross Baker and associates in the Canadian Adverse Events Study,1 have been accepted as a barometer of health care safety, yet they tell us vanishingly little about the situation in which the vast majority of patient contacts occur: the interface between patients and primary care practitioners or emergency physicians. Lack of treatment of hypertension or hyperlipidemia, insufficient emphasis on preventive medicine, and overprescribing or underprescribing of medication are a few examples of front-line errors that will not be captured in a chart review.
A neglected but extremely common type of error results from cognitive failure. Such errors underlie delayed or missed diagnosis, the commonest source of litigation for physicians. Quintessentially within the domain of the physician, diagnosis involves thinking, a private and invisible process. Furthermore, medical decision-making has been ill-served by traditional, quantitative models. No paradigm of clinical decision-making adequately describes real-world “flesh and blood” decisions, which can present significant hazards to patients. These cognitive failures will also be seriously underestimated in hospital chart reviews.
Baker and associates1 suggest that a trend toward more AEs in teaching hospitals may have been due in part to lower quality of care. In this respect, 2 major issues need fleshing out. First, care in teaching hospitals is often given by trainees suffering from fatigue, sleep deprivation and an accumulated sleep debt,2 all of which compromise performance3 and thereby contribute to error. It is still not uncommon to find Canadian residents in some disciplines working more than 100 hours/week, a workload that would be considered unsafe and unacceptable in any other industry. Second, these trainees are often inexperienced junior staff members, charged with providing clinical services that may lie beyond their level of expertise.
A final point: surgeons might be forgiven for feeling singled out through the inevitable comparisons made in this type of study. Surgery is a much more tangible business than other realms of medicine, and surgical errors of omission and especially commission are usually much more highly visible than those in other disciplines.4 Comparing medicine and surgery serves little purpose other than to draw attention to this tangibility and visibility.
Pat Croskerry Sam Campbell Department of Emergency Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax, NS
Footnotes
-
Competing interests: None declared.