Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest

Irina Haivas, Sara Schroter, Fabian Waechter and Richard Smith
CMAJ August 31, 2004 171 (5) 475-476; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031982
Irina Haivas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Schroter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Waechter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Conflict of interest has been defined as a set of conditions in which professional judgement concerning a primary interest (such as patient welfare or the validity of research) can be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain).1 The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) acknowledges that anyone involved in the peer review and publication process, including editors, might have conflicts of interest.2 Although many journals now publish authors' financial conflicts of interest, and reviewers are asked to declare if they have a conflict of interest with regard to individual manuscripts, little is known about editors' conflicts of interest and the mechanisms to manage them.

Editors of high-impact biomedical journals have indicated that it is unacceptable for editors to have financial interests in commercial companies,3 and a few editorials have described journal policies regarding editors' conflicts of interests.4,5,6 However, editorial conflicts of interest can operate on many levels beyond financial interest: editors may entertain a dislike for certain authors; an author's work may compete with or contradict an editor's own work in the same field; or an editor, having decided not to publish a particular author's submission, may be tempted to pursue the same idea with others deemed to be more capable.

Editors are responsible for making the ultimate decision about publication, but who regulates them in doing so? To encourage greater transparency and raise awareness that editors are not impervious to bias, BMJ now publicly declares the financial and nonfinancial conflicts of interest of its own editors and editorial board members.4 We were interested to know how willing other editors are to publicly declare their conflicts of interest, and to find out about current policies to protect authors from their potential effects.

We conducted a survey of journal editors to explore editorial policies toward conflicts of interest (financial and nonfinancial) of editors and other staff involved in manuscript decisions. In the absence of a published method for obtaining a representative and manageable sample of all medical journals, we focused on one important category, general and internal medicine, as an indicator for the overall situation. We used the ISI Web of Knowledge Journal Database Version 2001 (www.isiknowledge.com) to obtain a list of all 108 peer-reviewed journals in this category. Using computer-generated random numbers, we took a random sample of 35. Because top medical journals are commonly used to depict trends in scientific medical publishing, we also included a purposive sample of the top 5 US and 5 non-US journals in this category, ranked by impact factor. Five of these had already been selected through the random sampling, and so the total number of journals was 40. Three journals were then excluded: 1 had insufficient contact details, and 2 had ceased publication We sent senior editors a questionnaire asking about their journal's declaration of conflicts of interest for editors, editorial board members and other editorial advisers; how important they felt it was to declare conflicts of interest; and whether they intended to publicly declare these in the future. We followed up with non-respondents by telephone.

We received a response from 30 (81%) of the 37 journals. Of these, 19 (63%) felt it was either important or very important to declare the financial conflicts of interest of their editors; 13 (43%) felt that this was important for their editorial board members, and 11 (37%) for other editorial advisers (see online Table at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/171/5/475/DC1). Seven (23%) reported it was not important to declare editors' financial interests, and 4 (13%) did not respond to this item. Eleven (37%) reported that they do not intend to declare their editors' financial interests in the future, and 16 (53%) do not intend to do so for their editorial board members or other editorial advisers. Reasons for not declaring these interests included statements that it is “unnecessary,” that “editors do not have conflicts of interest” and that the “issue had never been considered.”

Only 9 (30%) stated they have an explicit policy to deal with editors' financial conflicts of interest; Box 1 lists elements that occur in most of these policies. (Only BMJ publicly declares individuals' conflicts of interest on its Web site.) Journals with higher impact factors were more likely to have a policy on editors' financial conflicts of interest than journals with lower impact factors. Seven respondents (23%) stated that they declare the nonfinancial conflicts of interest of their editors, 4 (13%) declare such conflicts for their editorial board members and 4 (13%) for other editorial advisers. However, there are few mechanisms in place to ensure that all declarations are updated, even where there is a policy of declaring these interests. It is often not made clear to readers exactly how some of these policies are implemented and how financial conflicts of interest are defined.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 1.

One limitation of our study is the focus on a single category of medicine. We are unsure how representative this category is of all medical journals. As we purposively included the top 5 US and 5 non-US journals in an influential category, it is possible that the results are an overestimate of current practice across all journals. As medical journals have led the way in introducing editorial policies to deal with conflicting intersts,2 it is likely that the situation is similar or worse in other scientific journals. We feel that all journals should have a policy to deal with these potential conflicts of interest; editors are not impervious to bias, and it is not acceptable to dismiss the issue as unimportant. There is a need for greater transparency for all journals, as editors should be accountable for decisions made about scientific research. However, even where policies are in place, we do not know how effective they are. The ICMJE and other publication bodies should meet to discuss the best approach to dealing with these issues.

Footnotes

  • Contributors: Richard Smith initiated the study; Sara Schroter, Irina Haivas and Fabian Waechter designed the study; and Irina Haivas conducted the study. All authors interpreted the results, assisted in writing and revising the paper, and gave final approval of the version to be published.

    Acknowledgements: This study was funded by the BMJ Publishing Group's research budget.

    Competing interests: All authors were affiliated with BMJ at the time this article was written. Richard Smith was the editor of BMJ and took part in the survey; he was responsible for devising BMJ policy on competing interests. He was paid a fixed salary and was not affected financially by the success or failure of the policy. Sara Schroter, Fabian Waechter and Irina Haivas were employed by BMJ while conducting this study.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Thompson DF. Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 1993;329(8):573-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Separate statements: conflicts of interest. Available: www.icmje.org/#conflicts (accessed 2004 May 28).
  3. 3.↵
    Van Kolfschooten F. Conflicts of interest: Can you believe what you read? Nature 2002;416:360-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Smith R. Making progress with competing interests. BMJ 2002;325:1375-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    James A, Horton R. The Lancet's policy on conflicts of interest. Lancet 2003;361:8-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Relman AS. Editor's reply to: Altman LK. Dealing with conflicts of interest [letter]. N Eng J Med 1984;311:405.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 171 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 171, Issue 5
31 Aug 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest
Irina Haivas, Sara Schroter, Fabian Waechter, Richard Smith
CMAJ Aug 2004, 171 (5) 475-476; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031982

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest
Irina Haivas, Sara Schroter, Fabian Waechter, Richard Smith
CMAJ Aug 2004, 171 (5) 475-476; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031982
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Editors' conflicting interests remain in the shadows
  • Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals
  • Evidence based publishing
  • Commercial influence and the content of medical journals
  • Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism in medicine in Canada
  • Preventing the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 into school settings
  • How should we move for health? The case for the 24-hour movement paradigm
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical ethics

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire