Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces

James Kennedy, Hude Quan, William A. Ghali and Thomas E. Feasby
CMAJ August 31, 2004 171 (5) 455-459; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040170
James Kennedy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hude Quan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William A. Ghali
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas E. Feasby
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

No Responses have been published for this article.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 171 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 171, Issue 5
31 Aug 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces
James Kennedy, Hude Quan, William A. Ghali, Thomas E. Feasby
CMAJ Aug 2004, 171 (5) 455-459; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040170

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces
James Kennedy, Hude Quan, William A. Ghali, Thomas E. Feasby
CMAJ Aug 2004, 171 (5) 455-459; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040170
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Critique of Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: The Hole Truth?
  • Prospective Assessment of Practice Pattern Variations in the Treatment of Pediatric Gastroenteritis
  • Gender differences in carotid imaging and revascularization following stroke
  • Complication Rates After Left- Versus Right-Sided Carotid Endarterectomy
  • Questions on the First Consensus Document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee on Carotid Artery Stenting
  • Improving the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy
  • Has evidence changed practice?: Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials
  • Is the Canadian health care system better for neurologic care?
  • Physicians, it's in your court now
  • The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Alcohol consumption and risk of cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding in patients with established atrial fibrillation
  • Emergency department use following incentives to provide after-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort study
  • Physician choices in pulmonary embolism testing
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Vascular surgery
    • Stroke

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire