Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
SynopsisH

Germany's new user fee cuts doctor visits

Claudia Orellana
CMAJ August 03, 2004 171 (3) 226-226-a; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1041004
Claudia Orellana
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Visits to physicians have decreased after the German government introduced a controversial £10 (about Cdn$16.50) user fee in January. Patients must pay for their first doctor's appointment each quarter.

During the first quarter of 2004, there was an average decrease in doctor visits of 10%, according to figures the Association of Statutory Insurance Physicians (KBV) released in late April. General practitioners saw 9% fewer patients, and consultants 10.5%.

The government introduced the fee in January 2004 as part of a health reform package to cut increasing health costs. After running a £2-billion (Cdn$3.3-billion) annual deficit for 3 years, the statutory health insurance system has moved into the black, making it possible to reduce monthly insurance payments.

“The fee is accomplishing its regulatory effect,” Health Minister Ulla Schmidt said.

But the physicians' association believes the crucial question is “not just how many people are staying away from the doctor's, but who is staying away,” says spokesperson Roland Stahl.

A June survey by the Employees Health Insurer, a public-private agency, indicates 9% of those insured went to work despite feeling slightly ill. Twenty percent of those who had reported in sick for less than 3 days in 2003 admitted they visited the doctor mainly to get permission to stay home.

“These results clearly suggest that unnecessary doctor visits are being avoided, which argues in favour of the fee,” says Rolf Mentzell, the Health Insurer's spokesperson in Hamburg.

The physicians' association argues the fee will work well if it deters those with a compulsion to make multiple doctor visits. “Doctors will have more time for the genuine patients, which is what we and the lawmakers want. But if the fee keeps socially disadvantaged patients away, naturally it would be disastrous,” says Stahl.

That's exactly what's happening, says the General Association of Patients, a lobby group. “The fee operates by social selection,” says Christian Zimmermann in Marburg. “For those who earn enough, £10 is nothing … while those who live in difficult financial circumstances have to think twice.”

The initial drop in doctor visits may be partially explained by a last-minute rush to beat the fee at the end of 2003, says Stahl. — Claudia Orellana, Tubingen, Germany

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 171 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 171, Issue 3
3 Aug 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Germany's new user fee cuts doctor visits
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Germany's new user fee cuts doctor visits
Claudia Orellana
CMAJ Aug 2004, 171 (3) 226-226-a; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Germany's new user fee cuts doctor visits
Claudia Orellana
CMAJ Aug 2004, 171 (3) 226-226-a; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1041004
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
  • A newborn requiring selective bronchial intubation
  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health care coverage
    • Global health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire