Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

The psychological impact of SARS: a matter of heart and mind

Kang Sim and Hong Choon Chua
CMAJ March 02, 2004 170 (5) 811-812; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1032003
Kang Sim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Choon Chua
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

SARS was the first novel infectious disease to emerge in the 21st century. Its dramatic appearance in major cities around the world, together with the fact that 20% of the 8400 infected individuals were health care workers,1 prompted epidemiologists and other scientists to move swiftly to study the disease and identify its causal agent.2,3 We now know that SARS is associated with a previously unrecognized virus, SARS-CoV.4 Rapid diagnostic tests using the polymerase chain reaction are being developed,5 and the treatment regimens used in the outbreaks of 2002–2003 continue to be reviewed and evaluated.6

It is interesting that, even during the height of the outbreaks, researchers were also trying to understand and measure the psychosocial effects of SARS.7,8,9 Compared with the available literature on the biology of infectious diseases, there have been considerably fewer published reports on the psychosocial impact of SARS and other disease outbreaks. Thus, the article in this issue by Nickell and colleagues10 (see page 793) makes an important contribution toward a better understanding of this often neglected area.

Their study was carried out in a large teaching hospital in Toronto in April 2003, during the peak of the first phase of the SARS outbreak in the city. The authors found significant levels of psychiatric morbidity, in that almost two-thirds of the staff surveyed reported increased levels of concern for personal and family health, and almost one-third of a subset of respondents who completed a 12-item General Health Questionnaire had scores indicating emotional distress. Their findings are consistent with those of studies on SARS in Taiwan, where up to 75% of health care workers experienced psychiatric morbidity (Dr. Mian-Yoon Chong, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan: personal communication, 2004). In Singapore, 238 cases of SARS were diagnosed during the outbreak, and we found that psychiatric morbidity was also present in up to 21% of health care workers within a large, primary health care setting (unpublished data).

Maunder and colleagues7 reported that some health care workers at Toronto's Mount Sinai Hospital experienced intense emotional reactions during the SARS outbreak, including the fear of contagion, feelings of stigmatization, loneliness, boredom, anger, anxiety and a sense of uncertainty. Similar reactions have been described in health care workers in the context of a previous botulism outbreak.11 These psychological responses may be associated with certain health-seeking behaviours. For example, Leung and colleagues9found that individuals in their community sample who had greater risk perception as well as moderate anxiety were more likely than those without to take precautions against SARS.

Although these studies of the psychosocial impact of SARS are both important and commendable, more work is needed. The psychological well-being of health care workers who deal with disease outbreaks, the responses of the public and the outcomes of intervention programs need to be set as priority areas for research, as the report of Canada's National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health urges.12 Whether or not SARS outbreaks recur,13 there will be other new emerging pathogens. The intriguing and worrisome characteristic of an emerging infectious disease is that the precise cause is at first unknown. This uncertainty in itself may increase the level of psychosocial morbidity.14,15

Three elements are needed in future psychosocial research on the impact of infectious disease. First, we need to adopt a systemic perspective. Just as it is important to appreciate and evaluate the psychosocial impact of any emerging infectious disease or nosocomial infection on patients and health care workers, it is equally important to determine the psychological effects of the disease on often unseen populations such as family members, nonmedical staff, medical colleagues in the community and the general public. This will enable a more comprehensive and balanced planning of efforts to alleviate such psychosocial burden or to mitigate its onset in the future. Second, because the psychological impact may persist or evolve over time, prospective research is warranted. Longitudinal studies will allow an assessment of the important determinants of psychological distress as well as the protective effects of certain coping strategies, with potential application in early identification of cases requiring more intervention. Third, in this era of evidence-based medicine, the outcomes of psychosocial interventions should be evaluated. This includes assessment of both individual- and group-based interventions and of other measures such as staff educational sessions, public education and the responsive communication of new information updates. A clearer understanding of these beneficial or therapeutic elements will facilitate the implementation of strategic mental health responses for people at risk.

Emerging new infections such as SARS exert a significant psychological impact on health care workers and the community at large, which in some instances requires flexible and appropriate interventions. It is an area that urgently needs more research. Enhancing the psychological well-being of health care providers, their families and the community is a crucial tool in the continuing vigilance and fight against emerging infectious diseases.

𝛃 See related article page 793

Footnotes

  • Contributors: Both authors contributed substantially to the drafting and revising of this article.

    Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. 1.↵
    World Health Organization. Summary table of SARS cases by country, 1 November 2002–7 August 2003. Geneva: The Organization; 2003 Aug 15. Available: www.who.int/csr/sars/country/2003_08_15/en (accessed 2004 Feb 6).
  2. 2.↵
    Poutanen SM, Low DE, Henry B, Finkelstein S, Rose D, Green K, et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N Engl J Med 2003;348(20):1995-2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med 2003;348(20):1986-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, van der Werf S, Brodt HR, Becker S, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1967-76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Tang P, Louie M, Richardson SE, Smieja M, Simor AE, Jamieson F, et al. Interpretation of diagnostic laboratory tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome: the Toronto experience. CMAJ 2004;170(1):47-54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Zhaori G. Antiviral treatment of SARS: Can we draw any conclusions? [editorial]. CMAJ 2003;169(11):1165-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ 2003;168(10):1245-51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Avendano M, Derkach P, Swan S. Clinical course and management of SARS in health care workers in Toronto: a case series. CMAJ 2003;168(13):1649-60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Leung GM, Lam TH, Ho LM, Ho SY, Chan BH, Wong IO, et al. The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57(11):857-63.
  10. 10.↵
    Nickell LA, Crighton EJ, Tracy CS, Al-Enazy H, Bolaji Y, Hanjrah S, et al. Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution. CMAJ 2004;170(5):793-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Cohen RE, Anderson DL. Botulism: emotional impact on patient and family. J Psychosom Res 1986;30(3):321-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health. Learning from SARS: renewal of public health in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada; Oct 2003. Available: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection/warnings/sars/learning.html (accessed 2004 Feb 6).
  13. 13.↵
    Low DE. Why SARS will not return: a polemic [editorial]. CMAJ 2004; 170(1):68-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Poole K, Hood K, Davis BD, Monypenny IJ, Sweetland H, Webster DJ, et al. Psychological distress associated with waiting for results of diagnostic investigations for breast disease. Breast 1999;8:334-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Thompson DR, Lopez V, Lee D, Twinn S. SARS: a perspective from a school of nursing in Hong Kong. J Clin Nurs 2004;13:131-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 170 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 170, Issue 5
2 Mar 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The psychological impact of SARS: a matter of heart and mind
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
The psychological impact of SARS: a matter of heart and mind
Kang Sim, Hong Choon Chua
CMAJ Mar 2004, 170 (5) 811-812; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1032003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The psychological impact of SARS: a matter of heart and mind
Kang Sim, Hong Choon Chua
CMAJ Mar 2004, 170 (5) 811-812; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1032003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (17)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Addiction and Mental Health Strategic Clinical Network
  • Kidney Health Strategic Clinical Network
  • Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Respiratory medicine
    • Psychiatry & mental health: adult
    • Physician health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire