Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Direct-to-consumer advertising

Marc Lacroix
CMAJ March 02, 2004 170 (5) 770; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031798
Marc Lacroix
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2004 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

Barbara Mintzes and colleagues1 conclude that if a patient brings up a DTCA drug with a physician, a prescription is likely to result. This conclusion might lead us to think that doctors feel pressured into prescribing medication. However, other studies have demonstrated that this is not the case. Spurgeon2 reported that doctors said they felt “little” or “very little” pressure from their patients related to DTCA. In fact, only 6% of the 200 general practitioners surveyed felt strongly pressured to prescribe medication that the patients had learned about through advertising. All of the doctors who opted for the medications that patients had requested (instead of their usual choices) agreed that the prescriptions were acceptable for the diagnosed conditions.

In a recent personal communication with Mintzes (Barbara Mintzes, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC: personal communication, 2003) I learned that physicians in the published study1 judged a total of 92% of new prescriptions for requested DTCA drugs to be “very likely” (50%) or “possible” (42%) choices for similar patients with the same condition. It would seem that both these options indicate some degree of confidence in the medications, since the word “possible” means that a thing may occur under appropriate conditions (such as a similar patient with the same condition). This perspective on the data is quite different from that presented by Mintzes and colleagues,1 who judged physician confidence in treatment choice in much more limited terms (they defined physician confidence on the basis of drugs that would be a “very likely” choice, i.e., 50%).

Moreover, DTCA was shown to be informative. Close examination of the results1 reveals that the patients who were most exposed to the advertising of prescription medicines were the ones that physicians considered the best informed. For 71.4% of prescriptions requested by patients in Sacramento, where advertising is more common, the physician considered the patient to be knowledgeable about the medicine; in Vancouver, the proportion was 53.3% (these data are for any drug, not just DTCA drugs).

These findings are congruent with those of a previous study3 involving 454 family doctors, who agreed that DTCA encouraged patients to take an active role in managing their health and led them to seek advice about problems that would otherwise have gone untreated.

Opponents of DTCA have never succeeded in demonstrating that the costs generated by an increase in the number of patients obtaining prescriptions for a drug that has been promoted by advertising are greater than the savings achieved by associated reductions in health services fees (e.g., hospital costs).

Marc Lacroix President and CEO LXB Communication-Marketing Montréal, Que.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: The author is the president of an advertising agency.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Mintzes B, Barer ML, Kravitz RL, Bassett K, Lexchin J, Kazanjian A, et al. How does direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) affect prescribing? A survey in primary care environments with and without legal DTCA. CMAJ 2003; 169 (5):405-12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Spurgeon D. Doctors feel pressurised by direct to consumer advertising [editorial]. BMJ 1991; 319: 1321.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Lipsky MS, Taylor CA. The opinions and experiences of family physicians regarding direct-to-consumer advertising. J Fam Pract 1997;45:495-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 170 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 170, Issue 5
2 Mar 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct-to-consumer advertising
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Direct-to-consumer advertising
Marc Lacroix
CMAJ Mar 2004, 170 (5) 770; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031798

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Direct-to-consumer advertising
Marc Lacroix
CMAJ Mar 2004, 170 (5) 770; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031798
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Highlighting obesity as a risk factor for endometrial cancer
  • Hepatitis B vaccination for Canadian children: time for an adult conversation
  • Codesigning a public health approach to preventing firearm-related suicide deaths with rural communities
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire