Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
SynopsisI

Is there a greater risk of dying in a car crash when other passengers are unrestrained?

Donald A. Redelmeier and Harriette G.C. Van Spall
CMAJ June 08, 2004 170 (12) 1793; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040623
Donald A. Redelmeier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harriette G.C. Van Spall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Cummings P, Rivara FP. Car occupant death according to the restraint use of other occupants: a matched cohort study. JAMA 2004;291:343-9.

Background: The direct benefit from wearing a seatbelt when travelling in an automobile is uncontestable and has resulted in laws making the use of seatbelts mandatory. It is uncertain if the risk of injury to a passenger is increased if other passengers in the same vehicle are unrestrained — that is, if unrestrained occupants become projectiles at the time of a crash.

Design: In a database analysis of fatal car crashes throughout the United States between 1988 and 2000, investigators evaluated the risk of dying when there was another occupant in the car who might act as a projectile. Each person in the car was considered a target if there was another occupant, whether or not that occupant was wearing a restraint. To control for crash characteristics, pairs of occupants were compared to a third person in the same vehicle, who served as a control. Relative risks for death were calculated for target occupants seated in all positions of the vehicle relative to other passengers in the vehicle.

Results: The authors report 1113 traffic crashes in which there was a driver and a front seat passenger, both of whom were wearing seatbelts, and a potential projectile occupant in the back seat who was not wearing a seatbelt. (The total of 1113 is calculated from the numbers presented in the third line of Table 4 of the study.) In this configuration of occupants, we calculated that the target died in 739 crashes, the control occupant died in 564 crashes and both target and control occupant died in 190 crashes. We also calculated that this yielded a relative risk of death for target passengers when other occupants were unrestrained of about 1.31 (739/564) (95% confidence interval 1.17–1.46), which persisted after statistical adjustments for selected characteristics and seating configurations. The risk ratios for death of target occupants reported in the study are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1.

Commentary: The results are intuitively appealing, yet they might overstate the association. Specifically, the nonrandomized seating arrangement of the occupants in the vehicles might have allowed uncontrolled factors to confound the analyses (e.g., the majority of front-seat targets were women, who are known to be more likely than men to die when hit by the same physical forces). Additionally, the pair-matching in this study allowed the same person to appear in multiple analyses and thereby created a false consistency in the results.

The investigators deserve congratulations for using a pair-matched design to tackle real-world driving. The results, as they acknowledge, conflicted with other studies on the indirect effectiveness of seatbelts for other passengers. Perhaps the results are a bit too good, given current estimates of the direct effect of seatbelts that suggest a 40%–45% reduction in risk of death for the user.1 For perspective, airbags offer about a 20% reduction in risk,2 and a speeding ticket offers, on average, about a 35% reduction in risk for 1 month for the driver.3

Practice implications: This study is welcome news for policy-makers in Canada wishing to expand current seatbelt laws and those in the United States wishing to enact seatbelt laws. Clinicians who focus on prevention can also refer to this study when recommending seatbelt use, since motor vehicle trauma is the leading cause of death of Canadians between the ages of 1 and 41. No contraindications to using seatbelts have been found, and the current study provides one more reason to encourage their use. Just as we caution those whose behaviour can be harmful to others through secondhand smoke, car drivers and passengers should insist that all occupants buckle up.

Donald A. Redelmeier Harriette G. C. Van Spall Division of General Internal Medicine Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre Toronto, Ont.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Evans L. Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold;1991. p. 219-39.
  2. 2.↵
    Evans L. Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold;1991. p. 239-43.
  3. 3.↵
    Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ, Evans L. Traffic-law enforcement and risk of death from motor-vehicle crashes: case-crossover study. Lancet 2003;361: 2177-82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 170 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 170, Issue 12
8 Jun 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is there a greater risk of dying in a car crash when other passengers are unrestrained?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is there a greater risk of dying in a car crash when other passengers are unrestrained?
Donald A. Redelmeier, Harriette G.C. Van Spall
CMAJ Jun 2004, 170 (12) 1793; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040623

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Is there a greater risk of dying in a car crash when other passengers are unrestrained?
Donald A. Redelmeier, Harriette G.C. Van Spall
CMAJ Jun 2004, 170 (12) 1793; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040623
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Applying the 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: 4. Managing uncomplicated hypertension
  • A newborn requiring selective bronchial intubation
  • Does β-blocker prophylaxis improve survival after major noncardiac surgery?
Show more Synopsis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health policy
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire