Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research article

The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada

G. Ross Baker, Peter G. Norton, Virginia Flintoft, Régis Blais, Adalsteinn Brown, Jafna Cox, Ed Etchells, William A. Ghali, Philip Hébert, Sumit R. Majumdar, Maeve O'Beirne, Luz Palacios-Derflingher, Robert J. Reid, Sam Sheps and Robyn Tamblyn
CMAJ May 25, 2004 170 (11) 1678-1686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040498
G. Ross Baker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter G. Norton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginia Flintoft
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Régis Blais
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adalsteinn Brown
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jafna Cox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ed Etchells
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William A. Ghali
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Hébert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sumit R. Majumdar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maeve O'Beirne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luz Palacios-Derflingher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Reid
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sam Sheps
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robyn Tamblyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Research into adverse events (AEs) has highlighted the need to improve patient safety. AEs are unintended injuries or complications resulting in death, disability or prolonged hospital stay that arise from health care management. We estimated the incidence of AEs among patients in Canadian acute care hospitals.

Methods: We randomly selected 1 teaching, 1 large community and 2 small community hospitals in each of 5 provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia) and reviewed a random sample of charts for nonpsychiatric, nonobstetric adult patients in each hospital for the fiscal year 2000. Trained reviewers screened all eligible charts, and physicians reviewed the positively screened charts to identify AEs and determine their preventability.

Results: At least 1 screening criterion was identified in 1527 (40.8%) of 3745 charts. The physician reviewers identified AEs in 255 of the charts. After adjustment for the sampling strategy, the AE rate was 7.5 per 100 hospital admissions (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7– 9.3). Among the patients with AEs, events judged to be preventable occurred in 36.9% (95% CI 32.0%–41.8%) and death in 20.8% (95% CI 7.8%–33.8%). Physician reviewers estimated that 1521 additional hospital days were associated with AEs. Although men and women experienced equal rates of AEs, patients who had AEs were significantly older than those who did not (mean age [and standard deviation] 64.9 [16.7] v. 62.0 [18.4] years; p = 0.016).

Interpretation: The overall incidence rate of AEs of 7.5% in our study suggests that, of the almost 2.5 million annual hospital admissions in Canada similar to the type studied, about 185 000 are associated with an AE and close to 70 000 of these are potentially preventable.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 170 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 170, Issue 11
25 May 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada
G. Ross Baker, Peter G. Norton, Virginia Flintoft, Régis Blais, Adalsteinn Brown, Jafna Cox, Ed Etchells, William A. Ghali, Philip Hébert, Sumit R. Majumdar, Maeve O'Beirne, Luz Palacios-Derflingher, Robert J. Reid, Sam Sheps, Robyn Tamblyn
CMAJ May 2004, 170 (11) 1678-1686; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada
G. Ross Baker, Peter G. Norton, Virginia Flintoft, Régis Blais, Adalsteinn Brown, Jafna Cox, Ed Etchells, William A. Ghali, Philip Hébert, Sumit R. Majumdar, Maeve O'Beirne, Luz Palacios-Derflingher, Robert J. Reid, Sam Sheps, Robyn Tamblyn
CMAJ May 2004, 170 (11) 1678-1686; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights of this issue
  • Health care as a risk factor
  • Slouching toward disclosure
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Irish National Adverse Event Study-2 (INAES-2): longitudinal trends in adverse event rates in the Irish healthcare system
  • Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Improving health care workers compliance with traceability by recording the nursing process at the point of care using a personal digital assistant with a barcode
  • Risk of Injuries around Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer and Its Precursor Lesions: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Sweden
  • Obstetrical safety indicators for preventing hospital harms: a scoping review protocol
  • Nature of adverse events with opioids in hospitalised patients: a post-hoc analysis of three patient record review studies
  • Adverse events in the paediatric emergency department: a prospective cohort study
  • Obstetrical safety indicators for preventing hospital harms in low risk births: a scoping review protocol
  • Study of a multisite prospective adverse event surveillance system
  • Identifying adverse events: reflections on an imperfect gold standard after 20 years of patient safety research
  • Improving communication lines: quality improvement project moving a department away from outdated paging
  • Transparency of health care safety outside of the institutional setting: Call to action
  • Transparence de la securite des soins de sante en dehors des etablissements: Appel a laction
  • Facilitators and barriers to safer care in Scottish general practice: a qualitative study of the implementation of the trigger review method using normalisation process theory
  • The impact of hospital harm on length of stay, costs of care and length of person-centred episodes of care: a retrospective cohort study
  • Measuring the cost of adverse events in hospital
  • Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Observational study to determine the utility of hospital administrative data to support case finding of English patients at higher risk of severe healthcare-related harm
  • Can differences in length of stay between Dutch university hospitals and other hospitals be explained by patient characteristics? A cross-sectional study
  • Quality-related events reported by community pharmacies in Nova Scotia over a 7-year period: a descriptive analysis
  • Importance of safety climate, teamwork climate and demographics: understanding nurses, allied health professionals and clerical staff perceptions of patient safety
  • Legacy Drug-Prescribing Patterns in Primary Care
  • Improving the quality of health care in Canada
  • An analogy between socioeconomic deprivation level and loss of health from adverse effects of medical treatment in England
  • Changing how we think about healthcare improvement
  • Improving cardiac operating room to intensive care unit handover using a standardised handover process
  • Hospital safety among neurologic patients: A population-based cohort study of adverse events
  • Implementation of a structured hospital-wide morbidity and mortality rounds model
  • Deriving literature-based benchmarks for surgical complications in high-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Adverse Outcomes Associated with Preventable Complications in Hospitalized Patients with CKD
  • Design and reliability of a specific instrument to evaluate patient safety for patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in a predefined care track: a retrospective patient record review study in a single tertiary hospital in the Netherlands
  • Fatal overdoses involving hydromorphone and morphine among inpatients: a case series
  • Understanding the epidemiology of avoidable significant harm in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study
  • Quality gaps identified through mortality review
  • The Irish National Adverse Events Study (INAES): the frequency and nature of adverse events in Irish hospitals--a retrospective record review study
  • Determinants of alternate-level-of-care delayed discharge among acute care survivors of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury: a population-based cohort study
  • Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review
  • Eleven-year descriptive analysis of closed court verdicts on medical errors in Spain and Massachusetts
  • Measurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review
  • Pilot study on identification of incidents in healthcare transitions and concordance between medical records and patient interview data
  • How safe is primary care? A systematic review
  • Effect of unintentional cyclophosphamide underdosing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma response to chemotherapy: a retrospective review
  • Responding to Acute Care Needs of Patients With Cancer: Recent Trends Across Continents
  • Expanding the scope of Critical Care Rapid Response Teams: a feasible approach to identify adverse events. A prospective observational cohort
  • Workplace training for senior trainees: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of current approaches to promote patient safety
  • High risk of adverse events in hospitalised hip fracture patients of 65 years and older: results of a retrospective record review study
  • How effective are patient safety initiatives? A retrospective patient record review study of changes to patient safety over time
  • Temporal trends in patient safety in the Netherlands: reductions in preventable adverse events or the end of adverse events as a useful metric?
  • Avoidability of hospital deaths and association with hospital-wide mortality ratios: retrospective case record review and regression analysis
  • Is researching adverse events in hospital deaths a good way to describe patient safety in hospitals: a retrospective patient record review study
  • Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study
  • CareTrack Kids--part 3. Adverse events in children's healthcare in Australia: study protocol for a retrospective medical record review
  • Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward
  • Patient safety, resident well-being and continuity of care with different resident duty schedules in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial
  • Medication-Related Emergency Department Visits in Pediatrics: a Prospective Observational Study
  • Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits
  • How do emergency physicians make discharge decisions?
  • How safe are our paediatric emergency departments? Protocol for a national prospective cohort study
  • Trying to Improve Care: The Morbidity and Mortality Conference in a Division of Rheumatology
  • Patient safety culture in China: a case study in an outpatient setting in Beijing
  • Unexpectedly long hospital stays as an indicator of risk of unsafe care: an exploratory study
  • Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Medication Errors in Kidney Transplantation
  • What would an Ian McWhinney health care system look like?
  • A quoi ressemblerait un systeme de sante concu par Ian McWhinney?
  • Assessing adverse events among home care clients in three Canadian provinces using chart review
  • A structured judgement method to enhance mortality case note review: development and evaluation
  • A pilot study on record reviewing with a priori patient selection
  • 'Bad apples': time to redefine as a type of systems problem?
  • Diaspora of clinical medicine: Exploring the rift between conventional and alternative health care
  • Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving?
  • Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study
  • When evidence and common sense collide: Resident hours and systems of care
  • Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events
  • Quand coincident la medecine factuelle et le bon sens: Heures de travail des residents et systemes de soins
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Falsely elevated point-of-care lactate measurement after ingestion of ethylene glycol
  • Severe necrotizing pancreatitis following combined hepatitis A and B vaccination
  • Can hockey playoffs harm your hearing?
Show more Research article

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Areas of Focus
    • Health services
  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement
    • Drugs: adverse reactions

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire