Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Physician supply: future tense

Chris MacKnight and David B. Hogan
CMAJ October 14, 2003 169 (8) 750-751;
Chris MacKnight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Hogan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Frank Denton and associates1 found that population aging would have little effect on the required supply of physicians in the future, although a redistribution among medical disciplines would be needed. Although we agree that a “Chicken Little” approach must be avoided, we feel that some acknowledgement of population aging is needed in planning for future physician resources.2

First, we would like to raise a methodological concern. The analysis by Denton and associates1 is based on current payments to fee-for-service physicians in Ontario, but it is doubtful that this is the most appropriate way to fund physician services for aging patients with multiple problems. Also, using historical data to project future needs is suspect; it implies that the way we do things now is optimal. In this case, it masks the changes that will be required in physicians' practices.

As the proportion of older adults in the population increases, the proportion of people seeking care who are older adults will also increase. Already, one-third of deaths from ischemic heart disease among women occur in those over the age of 85.3 Therefore, all physicians will be seeing more frail older adults with multiple active diseases and both functional and cognitive deficits. Such patients have better outcomes when cared for by a multidisciplinary team using the principles of comprehensive geriatric assessment.4,5 For the most part, such teams are not present in hospitals or communities, and no plans are in place to establish them. Medical trainees receive little training in these principles, and there is no movement afoot to address this educational gap. Although organized medicine and national medical organizations are addressing future human resources needs, Task Force Two (a group studying physician human resources) has so far estimated only total future physician numbers,6 and governments are not planning for the human resources required to care for an aging population. They need to plan for the development of teams of health care providers and must create incentives so that trainees choose careers in this area.

Will population aging affect the number of physicians required? As Denton and associates conclude,1 possibly not, in the aggregate. Will physicians practising 10 years from now have the same patient populations as are seen today? No. The medical profession and government must realize that health care over the next few decades will focus on frail older adults and must put in place the personnel and systems to provide the care they will need.

Chris MacKnight President David B. Hogan Past President Canadian Geriatrics Society Ottawa, Ont.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Denton FT, Gafni A, Spencer BG. Requirements for physicians in 2030: Why population aging matters less than you may think [editorial]. CMAJ 2003;168(12):1545-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Hogan S, Hogan S. How will ageing of the population affect health care needs and costs in the foreseeable future? Discussion paper prepared for the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, 2002.
  3. 3.↵
    Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. The changing face of heart disease and stroke in Canada. Ottawa: The Foundation; 1999.
  4. 4.↵
    Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Canadian Medical Association. Principles for medical care of older persons [policy]. CMAJ 2000;162(13):1871-2.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Task Force Two: A Physician Human Resource Strategy for Canada. Physician workforce in Canada: literature review and gap analysis. Ottawa: The Task Force; 2003.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 169 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 169, Issue 8
14 Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician supply: future tense
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physician supply: future tense
Chris MacKnight, David B. Hogan
CMAJ Oct 2003, 169 (8) 750-751;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physician supply: future tense
Chris MacKnight, David B. Hogan
CMAJ Oct 2003, 169 (8) 750-751;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Nodding and napping in medical lectures: an instructive systematic review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Virtual care and emergency department use
  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health policy
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire