Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Revamp Canada's public health system — and do it quickly: think-tank

Brent Moloughney, John Frank and Erica Di Ruggiero
CMAJ August 19, 2003 169 (4) 325;
Brent Moloughney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Frank
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Di Ruggiero
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the wake of this year's SARS outbreak, Canada must act quickly to improve its public health infrastructure and develop a comprehensive system that may include a national institute of public health, experts have concluded. The consensus was reached at a think-tank sponsored by the Institute of Population and Public Health (IPPH), 1 of the 13 institutes within the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

Recent editorials and commentaries (CMAJ 2002;166[10]:1245;1282-3) and assessments of system capacity (CMAJ 2002;166[10]:1319) have highlighted concerns about Canada's ability to prevent, detect and respond to public health emergencies, and to deal with ongoing public health challenges such as obesity.

In 2002 the IPPH created a committee to study the future of public health in Canada. It examined models for funding and organizing public health systems in other countries and Quebec (Can J Public Health 2003;94:190-2). The findings were then discussed at the spring think-tank, which brought together researchers, politicians, public health and health system experts, and representatives from professional associations.

They concluded that there is an urgent need to address the public health system's infrastructure problems by clearly defining the system's essential functions and the roles, responsibilities, linkages and accountabilities at each level of government. These roles must be supported by consistent legislation and appropriate delivery structures, funding levels and information systems, as well as adequate staff.

The final consensus was that the SARS crisis highlighted the need for more public health system capacity and surge capability, as well as for a comprehensive communications strategy. Heavy emphasis was placed on improved national leadership, which could include a national institute of public health and a broader public health mandate for the National Health Council proposed by Roy Romanow.

The next steps needed are a more detailed analysis of system requirements and development of a network of public health system experts and organizations to ensure that a comprehensive public health system is eventually created. — Brent Moloughney, John Frank, Erica Di Ruggiero, CIHR

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 169 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 169, Issue 4
19 Aug 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revamp Canada's public health system — and do it quickly: think-tank
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Revamp Canada's public health system — and do it quickly: think-tank
Brent Moloughney, John Frank, Erica Di Ruggiero
CMAJ Aug 2003, 169 (4) 325;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Revamp Canada's public health system — and do it quickly: think-tank
Brent Moloughney, John Frank, Erica Di Ruggiero
CMAJ Aug 2003, 169 (4) 325;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Announcing New JABFM Feature: Editors' Note
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire