Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Montreal GP's private-medicine battle heads to Supreme Court of Canada

Louise Gagnon
CMAJ July 22, 2003 169 (2) 140;
Louise Gagnon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A Montreal GP who has lost 2 lower court challenges is taking his fight for the right to provide private medical services to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The case concerns sections of 2 different pieces of Quebec legislation — article 11 in the Hospital Insurance Act and article 15 in the Health Care Act. They not only prevent physicians like Dr. Jacques Chaoulli from providing private services in hospitals, but also stop his patients from purchasing insurance to cover the cost of private medical care. Chaoulli, who trained in France but has practised in Canada since 1986, argues that this violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Chaoulli, who is funding the case personally and with donations from supporters, says his decision to pursue it despite 2 losses in lower courts has a medical precedent — Dr. Henry Morgentaler's battle to have Canada's abortion law declared unconstitutional. In 1988, the Supreme Court ruled that the law infringed upon women's charter rights.

Chaoulli's battle to practise private medicine started in 1996, when he went on a hunger strike to protest Quebec laws that prevented doctors who worked outside the public system from making emergency house calls. He maintains that if more private care was delivered, queues in the public system would be shorter.

“Physicians are faced with quotas and ceilings on their income as well as limited availability of operating rooms,” explains Chaoulli, whose case is expected to be heard next March. “… My victory in this case [would be] in the interest of all medical doctors in Canada.”

Dr. Ed Coffey, a past president of the Quebec Medical Association and an expert witness in the case, thinks the upcoming decision will have “momentous” consequences outside Quebec. “If the case is won by the plaintiffs, it would automatically apply to other provinces that have similar legislation. [If this happens] it will not invalidate the medicare system but will bring to light that there are alternative methods of insurance and health delivery.”

Bruce Johnston, a lawyer for the plaintiffs who is providing his services for free, is confident about the outcome.

“We are not arguing against the merits of the public system,” he says. “It's up to the government to regulate how a private system can function alongside a public system. The end result is that there will be more health care available.” — Louise Gagnon, Ottawa

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 169 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 169, Issue 2
22 Jul 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Montreal GP's private-medicine battle heads to Supreme Court of Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Montreal GP's private-medicine battle heads to Supreme Court of Canada
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ Jul 2003, 169 (2) 140;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Montreal GP's private-medicine battle heads to Supreme Court of Canada
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ Jul 2003, 169 (2) 140;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Canada will have three-digit suicide prevention hotline by 2023
  • Feds update immunization advice with Moderna vaccine approval
  • Trudeau promises to boost federal health transfers when the pandemic is over
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health care coverage
    • Canadian government

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire