Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Was BMJ dead wrong to print critical obituary?

Naomi Marks
CMAJ July 08, 2003 169 (1) 54-54-a;
Naomi Marks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 169 no. 1 54-54-a
History 
  • Published online July 8, 2003.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2003

Author Information

  1. Naomi Marks
  1. Brighton, UK

Usage statistics: July 2003 to April 2022

AbstractFullPdf
Jul 2003081949
Aug 20030764
Sep 20030405
Oct 20030344
Nov 20030320
Dec 20030202
Jan 20040311
Feb 20040282
Mar 20040401
Apr 20040400
May 20040613
Jun 20040520
Jul 20040560
Aug 20040691
Sep 20040350
Oct 20040340
Nov 20040180
Dec 20040220
Jan 20050272
Feb 20050250
Mar 20050270
Apr 2005080
May 20050120
Jun 2005080
Jul 20050160
Aug 20050123
Sep 20050164
Oct 20050142
Nov 20050150
Dec 20050150
Jan 20090102
Feb 2009061
Mar 2009040
Apr 2009030
May 2009030
Jun 2009060
Jul 2009020
Aug 2009031
Sep 2009050
Oct 2009002
Nov 2009020
Dec 2009010
Feb 2010001
Mar 2010021
Apr 2010002
Jun 2010002
Aug 2010032
Sep 2010043
Oct 2010031
Nov 2010094
Dec 2010050
Jan 2011062
Feb 2011071
Mar 2011060
Apr 2011031
May 2011042
Jun 2011020
Jul 2011092
Aug 2011071
Sep 2011080
Oct 2011041
Nov 2011072
Dec 2011035
Jan 2012033
Feb 20120171
Mar 2012021
Apr 2012074
May 2012053
Jun 2012051
Jul 2012010
Aug 2012061
Sep 2012034
Oct 2012011
Nov 2012020
Dec 2012040
Jan 2013051
Feb 2013081
Mar 2013070
Apr 2013072
May 2013033
Jun 2013030
Jul 2013042
Aug 2013021
Sep 2013042
Oct 2013030
Nov 2013071
Dec 2013042
Jan 2014020
Mar 2014011
Apr 2014031
May 2014031
Jun 2014021
Jul 2014051
Aug 2014051
Sep 2014070
Oct 20140102
Nov 2014081
Dec 2014082
Jan 2015060
Feb 2015092
Mar 2015090
Apr 20150103
May 2015081
Jun 20150180
Jul 2015021
Aug 2015031
Sep 2015052
Oct 2015031
Nov 20150103
Dec 20150122
Jan 20160114
Feb 2016042
Mar 2016064
Apr 2016084
May 2016062
Jun 2016072
Jul 20160155
Aug 20160190
Sep 20160114
Oct 2016017
Nov 2016075
Dec 2016034
Jan 2017080
Feb 2017031
Mar 2017070
Apr 2017011
May 2017032
Jun 2017011
Jul 2017071
Aug 2017030
Oct 2017030
Nov 2017060
Dec 20170105
Jan 2018081
Feb 20180153
Mar 20180123
Apr 2018070
May 20180140
Jun 20180110
Jul 2018070
Aug 2018032
Sep 2018040
Oct 2018031
Nov 2018041
Dec 20180211
Jan 2019030
Feb 20190121
Mar 2019061
Apr 2019030
May 2019040
Jun 2019042
Jul 2019082
Aug 2019062
Sep 20190151
Oct 20190120
Nov 2019073
Dec 20190184
Jan 20200180
Feb 20200113
Mar 20200291
Apr 20200140
May 20200241
Jun 20200210
Jul 20200241
Aug 20200203
Sep 20200161
Oct 20200242
Nov 20200242
Dec 20200296
Jan 20210292
Feb 20210205
Mar 20210262
Apr 20210330
May 20210281
Jun 20210134
Jul 2021063
Aug 2021050
Sep 2021051
Oct 20210100
Nov 2021074
Dec 20210134
Jan 2022040
Feb 20220165
Mar 20220110
Apr 2022022
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 169 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 169, Issue 1
8 Jul 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Was BMJ dead wrong to print critical obituary?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Was BMJ dead wrong to print critical obituary?
Naomi Marks
CMAJ Jul 2003, 169 (1) 54-54-a;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Was BMJ dead wrong to print critical obituary?
Naomi Marks
CMAJ Jul 2003, 169 (1) 54-54-a;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Is one-way masking enough?
  • XE, XD & XF: what to know about the Omicron hybrid variants
  • 5 infectious disease topics to watch
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Complementary medicine & alternative therapies
    • Journalology & publication ethics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire